Democratization in Armenia: Some Trends of Political Culture and Behavior

Q2 Social Sciences
V. Sahakyan, A. Atanesyan
{"title":"Democratization in Armenia: Some Trends of Political Culture and Behavior","authors":"V. Sahakyan, A. Atanesyan","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.14.3.347-354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Historically, Armenian society was organized by strong communities established around the Armenian Apostolic Church, which helped these communities survive throughout the centuries despite the lack of a central authority. Community relationships are still very essential, especially during political processes such as elections. Community ties, combined with democratic ideas, have fostered some democratic practices, but the former Soviet republics still have a long way to go before they can be described as liberal democracies. Elections play an important role in a free society. However, in some Newly Independent States' societies, they are seen as a hindrance. Some Newly Independent States espouse their own kind of democracy, which, they proclaim, serves as a bridge between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East (Kazakhstan). In the case of Armenia, it is a Christian island on the border of Europe and the Muslim world. Key words: community, democracy, Newly Independent States ********** Armenia was one of the Socialist republics within the former Soviet Union, covering an area of approximately 11,500 square miles. During the process of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Armenia was one of the first countries to witness a national movement and fight for and declare independence in 1991, before the formal declaration of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Although still formally a Soviet country, building democracy and a wholesale transforming of Armenian society became necessities. According to the theory of social institutions, the elements of social structure of any society are tightly interlinked, and changes in one institution lead to changes in others. In the case of Armenia, changing or reforming the political institution necessarily would stimulate some innovations and changes in others, such as the economical system, education, family structure and functions, and the role of religion. This was a new process. Even if some of the leadership responsible for the transformation had a theoretical notion of democracy and democratic transformation, such knowledge was not sufficient to successfully implement a program of transformation and make it work. Experience is still being accumulated in Armenia, as well as in other post-Soviet republics, but it is difficult to use the term democracy to describe the political system in Armenia. Historically, Armenian society was organized in strong communities established around the Armenian Apostolic Church, which helped the nation survive through centuries of statelessness. For long periods of their history, Armenians lived under the domination of various empires. Starting early in the common era, and especially during the period that followed Armenia's adoption of Christianity as a state religion in the early fourth century, Armenia came under the influence of or was conquered by the Greeks, Romans, Persians, Byzantines, Mongols, Arabs, Ottoman Turks, and Russians. In 1920, after two years of independence, the Russian sector, or Eastern Armenia, became a part of the Soviet Union until 1991. Community ties organized around the churches were the most important connections to preserve Armenian identity through those centuries, while many of their powerful neighbors of the time no longer exist as separate nations and states. The concept of community and related issues are discussed often, especially in contemporary literature, and has many connotations. The term could refer to small rural areas, where everybody knows each other, as well as large metropolitan districts. We define community as a group of people who share a common territory, are involved in everyday personal interactions, and invest an emotional dimension in their relations. Such community ties are shown in such interpersonal relations as friendships and cognizance of neighborhood and relatives. A community is usually small enough to produce a sense of commonality, which is defined by natural closeness of living places and the everyday activities of its members, by their day-to-day personal relationships, and by sharing some lifestyle. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"36 1","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.14.3.347-354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract: Historically, Armenian society was organized by strong communities established around the Armenian Apostolic Church, which helped these communities survive throughout the centuries despite the lack of a central authority. Community relationships are still very essential, especially during political processes such as elections. Community ties, combined with democratic ideas, have fostered some democratic practices, but the former Soviet republics still have a long way to go before they can be described as liberal democracies. Elections play an important role in a free society. However, in some Newly Independent States' societies, they are seen as a hindrance. Some Newly Independent States espouse their own kind of democracy, which, they proclaim, serves as a bridge between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East (Kazakhstan). In the case of Armenia, it is a Christian island on the border of Europe and the Muslim world. Key words: community, democracy, Newly Independent States ********** Armenia was one of the Socialist republics within the former Soviet Union, covering an area of approximately 11,500 square miles. During the process of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Armenia was one of the first countries to witness a national movement and fight for and declare independence in 1991, before the formal declaration of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Although still formally a Soviet country, building democracy and a wholesale transforming of Armenian society became necessities. According to the theory of social institutions, the elements of social structure of any society are tightly interlinked, and changes in one institution lead to changes in others. In the case of Armenia, changing or reforming the political institution necessarily would stimulate some innovations and changes in others, such as the economical system, education, family structure and functions, and the role of religion. This was a new process. Even if some of the leadership responsible for the transformation had a theoretical notion of democracy and democratic transformation, such knowledge was not sufficient to successfully implement a program of transformation and make it work. Experience is still being accumulated in Armenia, as well as in other post-Soviet republics, but it is difficult to use the term democracy to describe the political system in Armenia. Historically, Armenian society was organized in strong communities established around the Armenian Apostolic Church, which helped the nation survive through centuries of statelessness. For long periods of their history, Armenians lived under the domination of various empires. Starting early in the common era, and especially during the period that followed Armenia's adoption of Christianity as a state religion in the early fourth century, Armenia came under the influence of or was conquered by the Greeks, Romans, Persians, Byzantines, Mongols, Arabs, Ottoman Turks, and Russians. In 1920, after two years of independence, the Russian sector, or Eastern Armenia, became a part of the Soviet Union until 1991. Community ties organized around the churches were the most important connections to preserve Armenian identity through those centuries, while many of their powerful neighbors of the time no longer exist as separate nations and states. The concept of community and related issues are discussed often, especially in contemporary literature, and has many connotations. The term could refer to small rural areas, where everybody knows each other, as well as large metropolitan districts. We define community as a group of people who share a common territory, are involved in everyday personal interactions, and invest an emotional dimension in their relations. Such community ties are shown in such interpersonal relations as friendships and cognizance of neighborhood and relatives. A community is usually small enough to produce a sense of commonality, which is defined by natural closeness of living places and the everyday activities of its members, by their day-to-day personal relationships, and by sharing some lifestyle. …
亚美尼亚民主化:政治文化和政治行为的一些趋势
摘要:历史上,亚美尼亚社会是由围绕亚美尼亚使徒教会建立的强大社区组织起来的,这使得这些社区在缺乏中央权威的情况下存活了几个世纪。社区关系仍然非常重要,特别是在选举等政治进程中。社区关系与民主思想相结合,促进了一些民主实践,但前苏联加盟共和国在被称为自由民主国家之前还有很长的路要走。选举在自由社会中起着重要作用。然而,在一些新独立国家的社会中,它们被视为一种障碍。一些新独立的国家拥护它们自己的民主,它们宣称这种民主是欧洲、亚洲和中东之间的桥梁(哈萨克斯坦)。就亚美尼亚而言,它是一个基督教岛屿,位于欧洲和穆斯林世界的边界。关键词:社区,民主,新独立国家**********亚美尼亚是前苏联境内的社会主义共和国之一,面积约为11 500平方英里。在苏联解体的过程中,亚美尼亚是1991年苏联正式宣布解体之前最早出现民族运动、争取独立并宣布独立的国家之一。尽管形式上仍是一个苏联国家,但建立民主和全面改造亚美尼亚社会已成为必要。根据社会制度理论,任何社会的社会结构要素都是紧密相连的,一个制度的变化会导致其他制度的变化。就亚美尼亚而言,改变或改革政治体制必然会刺激经济制度、教育、家庭结构和职能以及宗教的作用等方面的一些创新和变化。这是一个新的过程。即使一些负责转型的领导有民主和民主转型的理论概念,这些知识也不足以成功实施转型计划并使其发挥作用。亚美尼亚和其他前苏联加盟共和国仍在积累经验,但很难用民主一词来形容亚美尼亚的政治制度。从历史上看,亚美尼亚社会是在亚美尼亚使徒教会周围建立的强大社区中组织起来的,这帮助这个国家度过了几个世纪的无国籍状态。在漫长的历史中,亚美尼亚人生活在各个帝国的统治之下。从公元早期开始,特别是在四世纪初亚美尼亚将基督教作为国教之后,亚美尼亚受到希腊人、罗马人、波斯人、拜占庭人、蒙古人、阿拉伯人、奥斯曼土耳其人和俄罗斯人的影响或被征服。1920年,经过两年的独立,俄罗斯部分,或东亚美尼亚,成为苏联的一部分,直到1991年。在那些世纪里,围绕教堂组织起来的社区关系是保持亚美尼亚身份的最重要的联系,而当时他们的许多强大的邻居不再作为独立的民族和国家存在。社区的概念及其相关问题经常被讨论,特别是在当代文学中,并且具有许多内涵。这个词既可以指每个人都认识的小农村地区,也可以指大城市地区。我们将社区定义为一群人,他们共享一个共同的领土,参与日常的个人互动,并在他们的关系中投入情感维度。这种社区关系表现在人际关系中,如友谊和对邻居和亲戚的认识。一个社区通常小到足以产生一种共同性,这种共同性是由生活场所和成员日常活动的自然亲密性、他们日常的个人关系和分享一些生活方式来定义的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信