[CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF TRANSURETHRAL INJECTION USING DEXTRANOMER-HYALURONIC ACID COPOLYMER (Deflux®) FOR CASES OF SECONDARY VESICOURETERAL REFLUX AFTER URETEROCYSTONEOSTOMY].
Y. Aoki, Z. Matsui, Atsuko Sato, Y. Morizawa, S. Iwasa, H. Satoh
{"title":"[CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF TRANSURETHRAL INJECTION USING DEXTRANOMER-HYALURONIC ACID COPOLYMER (Deflux®) FOR CASES OF SECONDARY VESICOURETERAL REFLUX AFTER URETEROCYSTONEOSTOMY].","authors":"Y. Aoki, Z. Matsui, Atsuko Sato, Y. Morizawa, S. Iwasa, H. Satoh","doi":"10.5980/jpnjurol.112.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Objective) We reviewed the clinical efficacy of transurethral Deflux® injection therapy (Deflux® injection therapy) in patients with secondary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after ureterocystoneostomy. (Methods) We retrospectively evaluated data for Deflux® injection therapy in 4 patients after ureterocystoneostomy with secondary VUR due to lower urinary tract dysfunction treated at this hospital from 2010 through 2018. The indications for surgery were febrile urinary tract infection or new renal scarring, and the outcomes of treatment with Deflux® injection therapy were evaluated. (Results) There were 2 male and 2 female patients. Three patients had unexplained lower urinary tract dysfunction, all patients were using clean intermittent catherization, and 3 patients had operated by the Cohen method for VUR. Preoperative examinations revealed that all patients had unilateral VUR, and reflux was assessed as Grade III in 1 patient and Grade IV in 3 patients. The median age at initial surgery was 12.8 years, and Deflux® injection therapy was performed unilaterally in all patients. Deflux® injection therapy was performed by a combined HIT/STING technique in 2 patients and by the HIT technique alone in 2 patients, with a median injection volume of 2.4 ml. The therapeutic outcome for initial Deflux® injection therapy was resolution of VUR in 1 patient (25%) and persistence of VUR in 3 patients. Treatment was repeated for 2 of the 3 patients with persistent VUR, and resolution was reported for 1 of these patients. (Conclusion) The initial success rate for Deflux® injection therapy in VUR with bladder dysfunction was a low 25%, suggesting that caution is required in choosing this treatment option.","PeriodicalId":38850,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Urology","volume":"91 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5980/jpnjurol.112.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
(Objective) We reviewed the clinical efficacy of transurethral Deflux® injection therapy (Deflux® injection therapy) in patients with secondary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after ureterocystoneostomy. (Methods) We retrospectively evaluated data for Deflux® injection therapy in 4 patients after ureterocystoneostomy with secondary VUR due to lower urinary tract dysfunction treated at this hospital from 2010 through 2018. The indications for surgery were febrile urinary tract infection or new renal scarring, and the outcomes of treatment with Deflux® injection therapy were evaluated. (Results) There were 2 male and 2 female patients. Three patients had unexplained lower urinary tract dysfunction, all patients were using clean intermittent catherization, and 3 patients had operated by the Cohen method for VUR. Preoperative examinations revealed that all patients had unilateral VUR, and reflux was assessed as Grade III in 1 patient and Grade IV in 3 patients. The median age at initial surgery was 12.8 years, and Deflux® injection therapy was performed unilaterally in all patients. Deflux® injection therapy was performed by a combined HIT/STING technique in 2 patients and by the HIT technique alone in 2 patients, with a median injection volume of 2.4 ml. The therapeutic outcome for initial Deflux® injection therapy was resolution of VUR in 1 patient (25%) and persistence of VUR in 3 patients. Treatment was repeated for 2 of the 3 patients with persistent VUR, and resolution was reported for 1 of these patients. (Conclusion) The initial success rate for Deflux® injection therapy in VUR with bladder dysfunction was a low 25%, suggesting that caution is required in choosing this treatment option.