The Heideggerian Ontology and The Exposure of The Being in the “Poetic Dwelling”

IF 0.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Marius Cucu, O. Lenţa
{"title":"The Heideggerian Ontology and The Exposure of The Being in the “Poetic Dwelling”","authors":"Marius Cucu, O. Lenţa","doi":"10.18662/brain/14.1/428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Heideggerian metaphysical ontology aims, above all, to reconceptualise the relationship between Being and being and to relate this founding corellation to human existence. For Heideggarian analysis, the authentic school of thought of the ancient Greeks has been forgotten, discarded, with this very act, itself, being silenced. Thus, the initial concept of Being, as thought up by Plato or the pre-Socratic philosophers, was replaced with that of being, resulting in the confusion of the two. Therefore, for more than two thousand years, the tradition of Western philosophy would discuss Being, but in reality the concept at stake was that of being. The Being, as a primordial reality without which absolutely nothing can be thought and uttered, not even Nothingness itself, was excluded from the exercise of meditation, being confused with beings, with ephemeral existences, be they material or animated. While looking for answers regarding the inquiry into the nature of Being, beings were wrongly looked at. But the Being continued to manifest its luminosity, in the sense evoked by Heideggerian metaphysics, especially around man, the only being of a special type, located in the opening of the Being, (Da-Sein) which can be reoriented from beings to Being, becoming, according to Heidegger, the shepherd of Being. Only in this way does he realize that his existence is a poetic one, that is, open to the non-hiding of the Being, in the sense of Heideggerian terminology. What is this type of poetic universally-human existence, so that it does not belong only to the poet, why was it forgotten along with the Being and what danger threatens modern man through this forgetfulness evoked by Heidegger? This article aims to capture some aspects of the conceptual area of these topics.","PeriodicalId":44081,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.1/428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Heideggerian metaphysical ontology aims, above all, to reconceptualise the relationship between Being and being and to relate this founding corellation to human existence. For Heideggarian analysis, the authentic school of thought of the ancient Greeks has been forgotten, discarded, with this very act, itself, being silenced. Thus, the initial concept of Being, as thought up by Plato or the pre-Socratic philosophers, was replaced with that of being, resulting in the confusion of the two. Therefore, for more than two thousand years, the tradition of Western philosophy would discuss Being, but in reality the concept at stake was that of being. The Being, as a primordial reality without which absolutely nothing can be thought and uttered, not even Nothingness itself, was excluded from the exercise of meditation, being confused with beings, with ephemeral existences, be they material or animated. While looking for answers regarding the inquiry into the nature of Being, beings were wrongly looked at. But the Being continued to manifest its luminosity, in the sense evoked by Heideggerian metaphysics, especially around man, the only being of a special type, located in the opening of the Being, (Da-Sein) which can be reoriented from beings to Being, becoming, according to Heidegger, the shepherd of Being. Only in this way does he realize that his existence is a poetic one, that is, open to the non-hiding of the Being, in the sense of Heideggerian terminology. What is this type of poetic universally-human existence, so that it does not belong only to the poet, why was it forgotten along with the Being and what danger threatens modern man through this forgetfulness evoked by Heidegger? This article aims to capture some aspects of the conceptual area of these topics.
海德格尔本体论与“诗意栖居”中存在的暴露
海德格尔的形而上学本体论的首要目的是重新定义存在与存在之间的关系,并把这种基本关系与人类存在联系起来。在海德格尔的分析中,真正的古希腊思想学派已经被遗忘,被抛弃,这一行为本身也被沉默了。这样,柏拉图或苏格拉底以前的哲学家所提出的最初的存在的概念,就被存在的概念所代替了,造成了两者的混淆。因此,在两千多年的时间里,西方哲学的传统一直在讨论存在,但实际上,争论的是存在的概念。存在,作为一种原始的实在,没有它,绝对没有什么东西可以被思想和表达,甚至连虚无本身也不能,被排除在静思的练习之外,被混淆为存在,与短暂的存在,无论是物质的还是有生命的存在。在寻找关于存在本质的答案时,存在被错误地看待了。但是,在海德格尔形而上学所唤起的意义上,存在继续表现出它的光辉,特别是围绕着人,人是唯一的特殊类型的存在,它位于存在的开端,可以从存在重新定向到存在,按照海德格尔的说法,成为存在的牧羊人。只有这样,他才能意识到他的存在是诗意的存在,也就是说,在海德格尔术语的意义上,对存在的非隐藏开放。这种诗意的普遍人类存在类型是什么,它不属于诗人,为什么它与存在一起被遗忘了,通过海德格尔唤起的这种遗忘,什么样的危险威胁着现代人?本文旨在捕捉这些主题的概念领域的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
47.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信