Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.2 Jurisdiction and Functions, Article 64

Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène
{"title":"Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.2 Jurisdiction and Functions, Article 64","authors":"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter evaluates Article 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 64 of the ACHR confers on the Inter-American Court, under certain personal and material conditions, the competence to render advisory opinions. This is therefore outside the realm of litigation, in that it is not a matter of deciding a dispute relating to the application or interpretation of the Convention but rather of answering a question in abstracto relating to human rights. Article 64 creates a particularly ambitious and original mechanism, bringing together both classical and innovative aspects. The advantage of this mechanism is that it can play a role in preventing violations of the Convention, if it is actually used. From its first opinion, the Inter-American Court laid down the purposes of this particular procedure. It is aimed to assist States in their implementation of the ACHR, and to assist other Organization of American States (OAS) member States not bound by the Convention and OAS organs. The advisory procedure before the Inter-American Court has, actually, no equivalent in comparison with other international courts and tribunals.","PeriodicalId":22363,"journal":{"name":"The American Convention on Human Rights","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Convention on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter evaluates Article 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 64 of the ACHR confers on the Inter-American Court, under certain personal and material conditions, the competence to render advisory opinions. This is therefore outside the realm of litigation, in that it is not a matter of deciding a dispute relating to the application or interpretation of the Convention but rather of answering a question in abstracto relating to human rights. Article 64 creates a particularly ambitious and original mechanism, bringing together both classical and innovative aspects. The advantage of this mechanism is that it can play a role in preventing violations of the Convention, if it is actually used. From its first opinion, the Inter-American Court laid down the purposes of this particular procedure. It is aimed to assist States in their implementation of the ACHR, and to assist other Organization of American States (OAS) member States not bound by the Convention and OAS organs. The advisory procedure before the Inter-American Court has, actually, no equivalent in comparison with other international courts and tribunals.
第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第2段管辖权和职能,第六十四条
本章评价《美洲人权公约》第64条。《美洲人权公约》第64条赋予美洲法院在某些个人和物质条件下提出咨询意见的权限。因此,这不在诉讼范围之内,因为这不是一个决定与《公约》的适用或解释有关的争端的问题,而是回答一个与人权有关的抽象问题。第64条创造了一个特别雄心勃勃和新颖的机制,将经典和创新方面结合在一起。这一机制的优点是,如果它得到实际使用,它可以在防止违反《公约》方面发挥作用。美洲法院在其第一份意见中规定了这一特定程序的目的。其目的是协助各国执行《美洲人权公约》,并协助不受《公约》约束的美洲国家组织(美洲国家组织)其他成员国和美洲国家组织机构。与其他国际法院和法庭相比,美洲法院的咨询程序实际上没有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信