Safety Assessment of a New Strain of Lactobacillus pentosus (IBRC=11143) As a Candidate Probiotic

Saba Bahrehvar, Shiva Khezri, A. Barzegari, V. Nejati
{"title":"Safety Assessment of a New Strain of Lactobacillus pentosus (IBRC=11143) As a Candidate Probiotic","authors":"Saba Bahrehvar, Shiva Khezri, A. Barzegari, V. Nejati","doi":"10.18502/pbr.v7i1.7355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is believed that the consumption of an adequate amount of live lactic acid bacteria (as probiotic) may improve the health of the host. Many strains of lactic acid bacteria are generally considered to be safe. However, some strains have shown some adverse effects. \nObjectives: This study aimed to investigate the safety of a new strain of Lactobacillus pentosus (IBRC=11143) in Wistar rats \nMethods:In this experimental study, male and female Wistar rats (n=6) were used. A subacute toxicity study (for 28 days) was conducted by oral administration of Lactobacillus pentosus to the animals. In each sex, one group received saline, and the other two groups received the bacteria at doses of 1×108 and 1×109 Colony-Forming Units (CFU)/rat. \nResults: No significant alteration in the liver and kidney tissues was seen. However, in both sexes, there were significant differences in urea and creatinine levels between the control and the experimental groups. Some blood parameters (Lymphocyte, red blood cell, hematocrit, and hemoglobin) also showed significant changes in the groups that received the bacteria. Moreover, a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase level was observed in male rats. \nConclusion: The results indicate that Lactobacillus pentosus (11143) is not entirely safe like other Lactobacillus strains. Therefore, the Lactobacillus pentosus (11143) strain may not be the right choice as a probiotic for human consumption.","PeriodicalId":6323,"journal":{"name":"2005 Asian Conference on Sensors and the International Conference on New Techniques in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 Asian Conference on Sensors and the International Conference on New Techniques in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/pbr.v7i1.7355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: It is believed that the consumption of an adequate amount of live lactic acid bacteria (as probiotic) may improve the health of the host. Many strains of lactic acid bacteria are generally considered to be safe. However, some strains have shown some adverse effects. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the safety of a new strain of Lactobacillus pentosus (IBRC=11143) in Wistar rats Methods:In this experimental study, male and female Wistar rats (n=6) were used. A subacute toxicity study (for 28 days) was conducted by oral administration of Lactobacillus pentosus to the animals. In each sex, one group received saline, and the other two groups received the bacteria at doses of 1×108 and 1×109 Colony-Forming Units (CFU)/rat. Results: No significant alteration in the liver and kidney tissues was seen. However, in both sexes, there were significant differences in urea and creatinine levels between the control and the experimental groups. Some blood parameters (Lymphocyte, red blood cell, hematocrit, and hemoglobin) also showed significant changes in the groups that received the bacteria. Moreover, a significant increase in alkaline phosphatase level was observed in male rats. Conclusion: The results indicate that Lactobacillus pentosus (11143) is not entirely safe like other Lactobacillus strains. Therefore, the Lactobacillus pentosus (11143) strain may not be the right choice as a probiotic for human consumption.
一株戊酸乳杆菌(IBRC=11143)作为候选益生菌的安全性评价
背景:人们认为,摄入适量的活乳酸菌(如益生菌)可以改善宿主的健康。许多乳酸菌通常被认为是安全的。然而,一些菌株已经显示出一些不利影响。目的:研究一株新型戊酸乳杆菌(IBRC=11143)在Wistar大鼠体内的安全性。方法:选用雄性和雌性Wistar大鼠(n=6)。对动物口服戊酸乳杆菌进行了为期28天的亚急性毒性研究。在两性中,一组注射生理盐水,另外两组注射剂量分别为1×108和1×109菌落形成单位(CFU)/大鼠。结果:肝、肾组织未见明显改变。然而,在两性中,尿素和肌酐水平在对照组和实验组之间有显著差异。一些血液参数(淋巴细胞、红细胞、红细胞压积和血红蛋白)在接受细菌的组中也显示出显著的变化。此外,雄性大鼠碱性磷酸酶水平明显升高。结论:戊酸乳杆菌(11143)不像其他乳杆菌一样完全安全。因此,戊酸乳杆菌(11143)菌株可能不是人类食用益生菌的正确选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信