Electrocardiographic characteristics, antiarrhythmic utilization, and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices

S. Lundgren, E. Lyden, D. Stoller, M. Hyden, A. Burdorf, R. Zolty, J. Um, B. Lowes
{"title":"Electrocardiographic characteristics, antiarrhythmic utilization, and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices","authors":"S. Lundgren, E. Lyden, D. Stoller, M. Hyden, A. Burdorf, R. Zolty, J. Um, B. Lowes","doi":"10.14434/VAD.V4I0.28039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nLeft ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an increasingly used therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. Arrhythmias are common complications following LVAD implantation requiring admission, initiation, and escalation of medical therapy. Despite their frequent use in the treatment of arrhythmias, little has been reported regarding electrocardiographic changes, antiarrhythmic utilization, and outcomes post-LVAD. \nMethods \nA total of 309 patients who received a LVAD underwent retrospective chart review pre- and post-LVAD. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression model was used for univariate analysis and those with a p \nResults \nThere was a significant reduction in both the QRS interval (p=0.0001) and QTc interval (p=0.0074) following LVAD implantation. Ventricular tachycardia is common following LVAD implant at 31.1%. Amiodarone use was frequent prior to LVAD (52.1%) and on discharge (68.6%). Amiodarone use (p=0.019, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), age at implant (p \nConclusion \nAmiodarone is a commonly used antiarrhythmic in advanced heart failure and its use prior to LVAD implantation may increase the risk of long-term mortality. Amiodarone's efficacy needs to be weighed against its long-term side effects and implant on clinical outcomes","PeriodicalId":91822,"journal":{"name":"The VAD journal : the journal of mechanical assisted circulation and heart failure","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The VAD journal : the journal of mechanical assisted circulation and heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/VAD.V4I0.28039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an increasingly used therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. Arrhythmias are common complications following LVAD implantation requiring admission, initiation, and escalation of medical therapy. Despite their frequent use in the treatment of arrhythmias, little has been reported regarding electrocardiographic changes, antiarrhythmic utilization, and outcomes post-LVAD. Methods A total of 309 patients who received a LVAD underwent retrospective chart review pre- and post-LVAD. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression model was used for univariate analysis and those with a p Results There was a significant reduction in both the QRS interval (p=0.0001) and QTc interval (p=0.0074) following LVAD implantation. Ventricular tachycardia is common following LVAD implant at 31.1%. Amiodarone use was frequent prior to LVAD (52.1%) and on discharge (68.6%). Amiodarone use (p=0.019, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), age at implant (p Conclusion Amiodarone is a commonly used antiarrhythmic in advanced heart failure and its use prior to LVAD implantation may increase the risk of long-term mortality. Amiodarone's efficacy needs to be weighed against its long-term side effects and implant on clinical outcomes
左心室辅助装置患者的心电图特征、抗心律失常的应用和结果
背景左心室辅助装置(LVAD)越来越多地被用于晚期心力衰竭患者的治疗。心律失常是LVAD植入后的常见并发症,需要入院、开始和药物治疗的升级。尽管它们经常用于治疗心律失常,但很少有关于左心室辅助器后心电图变化、抗心律失常应用和结果的报道。方法对309例接受左心室辅助装置的患者进行左心室辅助装置前后的回顾性图表分析。Kaplan-Meier曲线的计算和比较采用log-rank检验。结果LVAD植入术后QRS间隔(p=0.0001)和QTc间隔(p=0.0074)均显著缩短。LVAD植入后室性心动过速发生率为31.1%。胺碘酮在LVAD前(52.1%)和出院时(68.6%)使用频繁。结论胺碘酮是晚期心力衰竭患者常用的抗心律失常药物,在LVAD植入前使用胺碘酮可能会增加长期死亡的风险。胺碘酮的疗效需要权衡其长期副作用和植入物对临床结果的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信