The addiction model of eating disorders: A critical analysis

G.Terence Wilson
{"title":"The addiction model of eating disorders: A critical analysis","authors":"G.Terence Wilson","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(91)90013-Z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Addiction is a poorly understood and widely misused concept. Far from providing an explanation of eating disorders, the concept is itself in need of explanation. Addiction is most commonly viewed as a disease, and it is this notion that has been applied uncritically to eating disorders in general and binge-eating in particular. The associations between eating disorders and psychoactive substance abuse are reviewed. The evidence indicates a greater than expected rate of psychoactive substance abuse in patients with eating disorders, and vice versa. Interpretation of these findings is obscured by a number of methodological problems, including inconsistent diagnostic criteria and assessment methods of questionable validity. Family studies show a similar co-occurrence, but suffer from comparable shortcomings. Moreover, comorbidity rates between eating disorders and other psychiatric disorders are higher. Studies of clinical samples might simply reflect the well-known tendency for patients with multiple problems to seek treatment. Consistent with this view, the results of two community studies of eating disorder patients show no significant co-occurrence with substance abuse. Theoretical and therapeutic implications of the addiction model are measured against available evidence on the nature and treatment of eating disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 27-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(91)90013-Z","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029190013Z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Addiction is a poorly understood and widely misused concept. Far from providing an explanation of eating disorders, the concept is itself in need of explanation. Addiction is most commonly viewed as a disease, and it is this notion that has been applied uncritically to eating disorders in general and binge-eating in particular. The associations between eating disorders and psychoactive substance abuse are reviewed. The evidence indicates a greater than expected rate of psychoactive substance abuse in patients with eating disorders, and vice versa. Interpretation of these findings is obscured by a number of methodological problems, including inconsistent diagnostic criteria and assessment methods of questionable validity. Family studies show a similar co-occurrence, but suffer from comparable shortcomings. Moreover, comorbidity rates between eating disorders and other psychiatric disorders are higher. Studies of clinical samples might simply reflect the well-known tendency for patients with multiple problems to seek treatment. Consistent with this view, the results of two community studies of eating disorder patients show no significant co-occurrence with substance abuse. Theoretical and therapeutic implications of the addiction model are measured against available evidence on the nature and treatment of eating disorders.

饮食失调的成瘾模型:一个批判性的分析
成瘾是一个理解不深且被广泛滥用的概念。不仅不能解释饮食失调,这个概念本身就需要解释。成瘾通常被视为一种疾病,正是这种观念被不加批判地应用于一般的饮食失调,尤其是暴饮暴食。本文综述了饮食失调与精神活性物质滥用之间的关系。证据表明,饮食失调患者滥用精神活性物质的比例高于预期,反之亦然。这些发现的解释被一些方法学问题所掩盖,包括不一致的诊断标准和有效性可疑的评估方法。家庭研究也显示出类似的共同现象,但也存在类似的缺陷。此外,饮食失调和其他精神疾病的合并症发生率更高。对临床样本的研究可能只是反映出患有多种疾病的患者寻求治疗的众所周知的趋势。与这一观点一致的是,两项关于饮食失调患者的社区研究结果显示,饮食失调与药物滥用没有显著的共同发生。成瘾模型的理论和治疗意义是根据关于饮食失调的性质和治疗的现有证据来衡量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信