Astigmatic and refractive stabilization after cataract surgery.

T. Oshika, Shunji Tsuboi
{"title":"Astigmatic and refractive stabilization after cataract surgery.","authors":"T. Oshika, Shunji Tsuboi","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-19950701-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assessed the timing of astigmatic and refractive stabilization following six cataract surgery procedures with intraocular lens implantation in 229 eyes divided into six groups in the following incision sizes and methods of wound closure: 11-mm incision with running suture closure (26 eyes) 6.5-mm incision with running suture closure (29 eyes) 6.5-mm incision with single horizontal suture closure (25 eyes) 6.5-mm incision without suture closure (46 eyes) 5.5-mm incision without suture closure (51 eyes) 3.2-mm incision without suture closure (52 eyes) Analyzed up to 6 months postoperatively were: the mean and standard deviation of axis-based keratometric cylinders the absolute value of the induced-cylinder vector the spherical equivalent of the refractive power. In the 11- and 6.5-mm incision running suture groups, these parameters did not stabilize during the study period. In the 6.5-mm incision horizontal suture and sutureless groups, the values stabilized at 3 months postoperatively; in the 5.5-mm incision group, at 1 month; and in the 3.2-mm incision group, at 2 weeks. These results indicate that the appropriate point at which to prescribe postoperative correction spectacles differs significantly depending on the procedure, and that smaller incisions with wound-closure methods that do not exert vertical force are associated with fewer postoperative refractive changes.","PeriodicalId":19625,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery","volume":"90 1","pages":"309-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-19950701-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

We assessed the timing of astigmatic and refractive stabilization following six cataract surgery procedures with intraocular lens implantation in 229 eyes divided into six groups in the following incision sizes and methods of wound closure: 11-mm incision with running suture closure (26 eyes) 6.5-mm incision with running suture closure (29 eyes) 6.5-mm incision with single horizontal suture closure (25 eyes) 6.5-mm incision without suture closure (46 eyes) 5.5-mm incision without suture closure (51 eyes) 3.2-mm incision without suture closure (52 eyes) Analyzed up to 6 months postoperatively were: the mean and standard deviation of axis-based keratometric cylinders the absolute value of the induced-cylinder vector the spherical equivalent of the refractive power. In the 11- and 6.5-mm incision running suture groups, these parameters did not stabilize during the study period. In the 6.5-mm incision horizontal suture and sutureless groups, the values stabilized at 3 months postoperatively; in the 5.5-mm incision group, at 1 month; and in the 3.2-mm incision group, at 2 weeks. These results indicate that the appropriate point at which to prescribe postoperative correction spectacles differs significantly depending on the procedure, and that smaller incisions with wound-closure methods that do not exert vertical force are associated with fewer postoperative refractive changes.
白内障手术后的散光和屈光稳定。
我们对229只眼进行了6次人工晶状体植入术后的散光和屈光稳定时间进行了评估,这些眼按以下切口大小和伤口闭合方法分为6组:11mm切口行缝合(26眼)6.5 mm切口行缝合(29眼)6.5 mm切口单水平缝合(25眼)6.5 mm切口不行缝合(46眼)5.5 mm切口不行缝合(51眼)3.2 mm切口不行缝合(52眼)术后6个月分析:轴基角化柱面的平均值和标准差是诱导柱面矢量的绝对值,是折光功率的球面等效。在11和6.5 mm切口顺线组中,这些参数在研究期间没有稳定下来。6.5 mm切口水平缝合组和不缝合组在术后3个月稳定;5.5 mm切口组,1个月;3.2 mm切口组,2周。这些结果表明,处方术后矫正眼镜的适当点因手术的不同而有很大的不同,并且使用不施加垂直力的伤口闭合方法的较小切口与较少的术后屈光变化相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信