I. Kruglova, T. V. Paranina, S. Zinoviev, O. Utkin, A. Denisenko
{"title":"Urgent intraoperative cytological diagnosis of spherical mass lesions in the lungs","authors":"I. Kruglova, T. V. Paranina, S. Zinoviev, O. Utkin, A. Denisenko","doi":"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-3-357-365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions is one of the most difficult tasks not only in pulmonology but also in phthisiology, because clinical manifestations, data from visual and laboratory examinations are undifferentiated in the early stages. In the case of an unclear diagnosis, morphological verification of the process played a crucial role. Urgent intraoperative examination is the most difficult option for morphologic verification of lung lesions, which requires a quick, detailed, and accurate answer.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance and efficacy of urgent intraoperative cytologic examination in the differential diagnosis between granulomatous (tuberculosis, sarcoidosis), tumor and tumor-like lesions of the lung.Methods. The results of urgent intraoperative cytologic examination of 173 tissue specimens from lung masses were retrospectively analyzed. Cytologic specimens were stained by the May – Grunwald – Giemse and Ziehl – Neelsen methods and then visualized on a Zeiss Lab A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). The obtained data are compared with the results of histological examination. To evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative cytologic examination, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.Results. Analysis of the results of urgent cytological examinations (n = 173) shows that granulomatosis (tuberculosis/sarcoidosis) was established in 64.7% of cases, malignancy – in 31 cases (cancer – 9.2%, carcinoid tumor – 2.9%, malignant neoplasm of unclear etiology – 4%, suspected malignant lesion – 1.7%); benign process – in 9.2% of cases (hamartoma + chondroma – 5.2%, chronic inflammation – 4%). 1.2% of the cases had no diagnostic material. When comparing the obtained results, there was a discrepancy between the histological picture (2.9% of cases) and the primary clinical diagnosis (5.7% of cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cytologic examination of intraoperative material amounted to 95.9, 71, and 98%, respectively.Conclusion. The high sensitivity and accuracy (> 90%) of urgent cytologic diagnosis of pathologic processes in the lung under intraoperative conditions were demonstrated by the correct assessment of morphologic signs of a given lesion and by their comparison with the clinical picture and the results of additional examinations. Analysis of cytological specimens showed that urgent cytological examination significantly complements the morphological picture of lung lesions and can be considered as the first stage of phenotypic diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":37383,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonologiya","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-3-357-365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Differential diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions is one of the most difficult tasks not only in pulmonology but also in phthisiology, because clinical manifestations, data from visual and laboratory examinations are undifferentiated in the early stages. In the case of an unclear diagnosis, morphological verification of the process played a crucial role. Urgent intraoperative examination is the most difficult option for morphologic verification of lung lesions, which requires a quick, detailed, and accurate answer.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance and efficacy of urgent intraoperative cytologic examination in the differential diagnosis between granulomatous (tuberculosis, sarcoidosis), tumor and tumor-like lesions of the lung.Methods. The results of urgent intraoperative cytologic examination of 173 tissue specimens from lung masses were retrospectively analyzed. Cytologic specimens were stained by the May – Grunwald – Giemse and Ziehl – Neelsen methods and then visualized on a Zeiss Lab A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). The obtained data are compared with the results of histological examination. To evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative cytologic examination, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.Results. Analysis of the results of urgent cytological examinations (n = 173) shows that granulomatosis (tuberculosis/sarcoidosis) was established in 64.7% of cases, malignancy – in 31 cases (cancer – 9.2%, carcinoid tumor – 2.9%, malignant neoplasm of unclear etiology – 4%, suspected malignant lesion – 1.7%); benign process – in 9.2% of cases (hamartoma + chondroma – 5.2%, chronic inflammation – 4%). 1.2% of the cases had no diagnostic material. When comparing the obtained results, there was a discrepancy between the histological picture (2.9% of cases) and the primary clinical diagnosis (5.7% of cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cytologic examination of intraoperative material amounted to 95.9, 71, and 98%, respectively.Conclusion. The high sensitivity and accuracy (> 90%) of urgent cytologic diagnosis of pathologic processes in the lung under intraoperative conditions were demonstrated by the correct assessment of morphologic signs of a given lesion and by their comparison with the clinical picture and the results of additional examinations. Analysis of cytological specimens showed that urgent cytological examination significantly complements the morphological picture of lung lesions and can be considered as the first stage of phenotypic diagnosis.
PulmonologiyaMedicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to state a scientific position of the Russian Respiratory Society (RRS) on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases based on recent evidence-based clinical trial publications and international consensuses. The most important tasks of the journal are: -improvement proficiency qualifications of respiratory specialists; -education in pulmonology; -prompt publication of original studies on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases; -sharing clinical experience and information about pulmonology service organization in different regions of Russia; -information on current protocols, standards and recommendations of international respiratory societies; -discussion and consequent publication Russian consensus documents and announcement of RRS activities; -publication and comments of regulatory documents of Russian Ministry of Health; -historical review of Russian pulmonology development. The scientific concept of the journal includes publication of current evidence-based studies on respiratory medicine and their discussion with the participation of Russian and foreign experts and development of national consensus documents on respiratory medicine. Russian and foreign respiratory specialists including pneumologists, TB specialists, thoracic surgeons, allergists, clinical immunologists, pediatricians, oncologists, physiologists, and therapeutists are invited to publish article in the journal.