Screen Time and Developmental Eye Movement Testing in Middle School Students

{"title":"Screen Time and Developmental Eye Movement Testing in Middle School Students","authors":"","doi":"10.31707/vdr2021.7.2.p107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Screen time continues to increase among children and youth, yet little is known about its potential effects on oculomotor development and function. The aims of the current study were to (a) compare oculomotor function in children today to those tested before smartphone use and (b) explore correlations between screen time use and oculomotor function among children today.\nMethod: A retrospective comparison was conducted comparing normative data published in the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test manual in 1990, prior to the invention of smart devices, to data collected in 2020. Correlations between screen time and DEM variables were also explored within the current sample.\nResults: Sixty middle school students reported spending on average 45.5 hours/week on screens with approximately 18.5 hours/week on iPhones, 14.5 hours/week on television and 10.5 hours/week on computers. Surprisingly, DEM performance was not significantly improved in the current sample compared to the historical sample. There were also no significant correlations between any screen time variables and oculomotor metrics within the current sample.\nConclusion: Despite the significant increase in screen time usage since 1990, DEM performance was replicable among 6th, 7th, and 8th grader students tested 30 years later. A statistically significant difference was found among 7th graders on DEM Vertical, where the 2020 students performed slower however, this difference may not be clinically significant. Importantly, DEM Ratio, a key variable for identifying ocular motility dysfunction (OMD), was also not significantly different between 1990 and 2020. Moreover, screen time in the current sample did not correlate with any DEM variables. This study provides preliminary evidence indicating that as measured by the DEM Test, increased screen time may not affect ocular motility. Further research is warranted using more finite methods for measuring saccade and smooth pursuit eye movements during the use of screened devices.","PeriodicalId":91423,"journal":{"name":"Vision development and rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision development and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31707/vdr2021.7.2.p107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screen time continues to increase among children and youth, yet little is known about its potential effects on oculomotor development and function. The aims of the current study were to (a) compare oculomotor function in children today to those tested before smartphone use and (b) explore correlations between screen time use and oculomotor function among children today. Method: A retrospective comparison was conducted comparing normative data published in the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test manual in 1990, prior to the invention of smart devices, to data collected in 2020. Correlations between screen time and DEM variables were also explored within the current sample. Results: Sixty middle school students reported spending on average 45.5 hours/week on screens with approximately 18.5 hours/week on iPhones, 14.5 hours/week on television and 10.5 hours/week on computers. Surprisingly, DEM performance was not significantly improved in the current sample compared to the historical sample. There were also no significant correlations between any screen time variables and oculomotor metrics within the current sample. Conclusion: Despite the significant increase in screen time usage since 1990, DEM performance was replicable among 6th, 7th, and 8th grader students tested 30 years later. A statistically significant difference was found among 7th graders on DEM Vertical, where the 2020 students performed slower however, this difference may not be clinically significant. Importantly, DEM Ratio, a key variable for identifying ocular motility dysfunction (OMD), was also not significantly different between 1990 and 2020. Moreover, screen time in the current sample did not correlate with any DEM variables. This study provides preliminary evidence indicating that as measured by the DEM Test, increased screen time may not affect ocular motility. Further research is warranted using more finite methods for measuring saccade and smooth pursuit eye movements during the use of screened devices.
萤幕时间与中学生发展性眼动测验
背景:在儿童和青少年中,屏幕时间持续增加,但对其对动眼肌发育和功能的潜在影响知之甚少。当前研究的目的是(a)比较当今儿童的眼动功能与使用智能手机之前的测试结果;(b)探索当今儿童使用屏幕时间与眼动功能之间的相关性。方法:回顾性比较1990年智能设备发明之前《发育性眼动(DEM)测试手册》中公布的规范性数据与2020年收集的数据。屏幕时间和DEM变量之间的相关性也在当前的样本中进行了探讨。结果:60名中学生平均每周花在屏幕上的时间为45.5小时,其中iphone约为18.5小时,电视14.5小时,电脑10.5小时。令人惊讶的是,与历史样本相比,当前样本中的DEM性能没有显着提高。在当前的样本中,任何屏幕时间变量和眼动指标之间也没有显著的相关性。结论:尽管自1990年以来,屏幕时间使用显著增加,但30年后,六年级、七年级和八年级学生的DEM表现可复制。七年级学生在DEM垂直上的表现有统计学上的显著差异,其中2020年级的学生表现较慢,但这种差异可能不具有临床意义。重要的是,作为识别眼动功能障碍(OMD)的关键变量,DEM比率在1990年和2020年之间也没有显著差异。此外,当前样本中的屏幕时间与任何DEM变量无关。本研究提供的初步证据表明,通过DEM测试,屏幕时间的增加可能不会影响眼球运动。进一步的研究需要使用更有限的方法来测量在使用屏幕设备期间的扫视和平滑的眼球运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信