Human rights and housing unaffordability: Applying policy practice engagement to a wicked problem

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Michael Webster
{"title":"Human rights and housing unaffordability: Applying policy practice engagement to a wicked problem","authors":"Michael Webster","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss4id911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: In working with marginalised communities, social workers are confronted with the consequences of housing unaffordability. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by Aotearoa New Zealand, identifies housing deprivation as a human right of relevance to social work. This study explores the application of the Policy Practice Engagement (PPE) framework (Gal Weiss-Gal, 2015) as a tool by which social workers can contribute to policy-making processes to address the human right to affordable housing.METHOD: The project used a descriptive/exploratory design. Data were collected by semi- structured interviews of eight subject matter experts in housing affordability: two public sector economists; one private sector economist/developer; two public sector urban planners; one public policy advisor; one non-governmental policy analyst; and one private sector housing strategist. Data were analysed thematically, followed by an inter-rater process.FINDINGS: Participants identified human rights as relevant to the wicked problem (Grint, 2005) of housing affordability. Participants also identified political, economic and environmental factors impacting affordable housing. They considered that these factors are found in local body planning regulations, leading to land supply constraints. Some participants considered that housing unaffordability is the price paid to live in liveable cities.CONCLUSIONS: The PPE framework offers a conceptual structure through which social workers can address housing unaffordability. By understanding the factors causing unaffordability, social workers are enabled to examine why and how they should contribute to policy processes.","PeriodicalId":44524,"journal":{"name":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss4id911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In working with marginalised communities, social workers are confronted with the consequences of housing unaffordability. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by Aotearoa New Zealand, identifies housing deprivation as a human right of relevance to social work. This study explores the application of the Policy Practice Engagement (PPE) framework (Gal Weiss-Gal, 2015) as a tool by which social workers can contribute to policy-making processes to address the human right to affordable housing.METHOD: The project used a descriptive/exploratory design. Data were collected by semi- structured interviews of eight subject matter experts in housing affordability: two public sector economists; one private sector economist/developer; two public sector urban planners; one public policy advisor; one non-governmental policy analyst; and one private sector housing strategist. Data were analysed thematically, followed by an inter-rater process.FINDINGS: Participants identified human rights as relevant to the wicked problem (Grint, 2005) of housing affordability. Participants also identified political, economic and environmental factors impacting affordable housing. They considered that these factors are found in local body planning regulations, leading to land supply constraints. Some participants considered that housing unaffordability is the price paid to live in liveable cities.CONCLUSIONS: The PPE framework offers a conceptual structure through which social workers can address housing unaffordability. By understanding the factors causing unaffordability, social workers are enabled to examine why and how they should contribute to policy processes.
人权和住房负担不起:将政策实践参与应用于一个棘手的问题
简介:在与边缘化社区的工作中,社会工作者面临着住房负担不起的后果。1948年新西兰通过的《世界人权宣言》(UDHR)将住房剥夺确定为与社会工作相关的一项人权。本研究探讨了政策实践参与(PPE)框架(Gal Weiss-Gal, 2015)作为一种工具的应用,社会工作者可以通过该框架为政策制定过程做出贡献,以解决经济适用房的人权问题。方法:本研究采用描述性/探索性设计。数据是通过对8位住房负担能力方面的专家进行半结构化访谈收集的:两位公共部门经济学家;一名私营部门经济学家/发展商;两名公共部门城市规划师;一名公共政策顾问;一名非政府政策分析家;还有一位私营部门的房地产策略师。数据是按主题分析的,然后是一个分级过程。研究发现:参与者认为人权与住房负担能力的邪恶问题(Grint, 2005)有关。与会者还确定了影响可负担住房的政治、经济和环境因素。他们认为,这些因素都存在于地方机构的规划法规中,导致土地供应受限。有些嘉宾认为,买不起房是在宜居城市生活的代价。结论:PPE框架提供了一个社会工作者可以解决住房负担能力问题的概念结构。通过了解导致负担不起的因素,社会工作者能够检查他们为什么以及如何为政策进程做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信