Cost Optimization of Absorption Capture Process

Cemil Şahin, L. Øi
{"title":"Cost Optimization of Absorption Capture Process","authors":"Cemil Şahin, L. Øi","doi":"10.3384/ECP17142187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a CO2 absorption process using aqueous monoethanol amine (MEA) as solvent for a post combustion capture plant was simulated using Aspen HYSYS. An Aspen HYSYS spreadsheet was used for equipment dimensioning, cost estimation and cost optimization. A standard process and a vapor recompression process for 85 % CO2 removal were simulated using the Li-Mather thermodynamic model. The energy consumptions and the total cost were calculated and compared. Cost optimum process parameters were calculated from sensitivity analysis. The vapor recompression process was shown to be both energy and cost optimum. With 20 years calculation period, the cost optimum absorber packing height was 16 meter, optimum temperature approach was 14 K and optimum recompression pressure was 130 kPa. With 10 years calculation period, the optimum values for the same parameters were 16 meter, 17 K and 140 kPa. Calculations of optimum process parameters dependent on factors like the calculation period have not been found in literature. Except from the temperature approach, the optimum values varied only slightly when the calculation period was changed.","PeriodicalId":56990,"journal":{"name":"建模与仿真(英文)","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"建模与仿真(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/ECP17142187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, a CO2 absorption process using aqueous monoethanol amine (MEA) as solvent for a post combustion capture plant was simulated using Aspen HYSYS. An Aspen HYSYS spreadsheet was used for equipment dimensioning, cost estimation and cost optimization. A standard process and a vapor recompression process for 85 % CO2 removal were simulated using the Li-Mather thermodynamic model. The energy consumptions and the total cost were calculated and compared. Cost optimum process parameters were calculated from sensitivity analysis. The vapor recompression process was shown to be both energy and cost optimum. With 20 years calculation period, the cost optimum absorber packing height was 16 meter, optimum temperature approach was 14 K and optimum recompression pressure was 130 kPa. With 10 years calculation period, the optimum values for the same parameters were 16 meter, 17 K and 140 kPa. Calculations of optimum process parameters dependent on factors like the calculation period have not been found in literature. Except from the temperature approach, the optimum values varied only slightly when the calculation period was changed.
吸收捕集工艺的成本优化
在这项工作中,利用Aspen HYSYS模拟了以水单乙醇胺(MEA)为溶剂的燃烧后捕集装置的二氧化碳吸收过程。使用阿斯彭HYSYS电子表格进行设备尺寸,成本估算和成本优化。采用Li-Mather热力学模型模拟了标准过程和蒸汽再压缩过程去除85% CO2的过程。对能耗和总成本进行了计算和比较。通过灵敏度分析,计算出成本最优工艺参数。结果表明,蒸汽再压缩工艺在能量和成本上都是最优的。以20年为计算周期,最佳吸振器填料高度为16 m,最佳温度为14 K,最佳再压缩压力为130 kPa。在10年的计算周期内,相同参数的最优值为16米、17 K、140 kPa。根据计算周期等因素计算最佳工艺参数在文献中尚未发现。除温度法外,随着计算周期的变化,最优值变化不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信