Reconciling community land and state forest claims in Indonesia: A case study of the Land Tenure Settlement Reconciliation Program in South Sumatra

IF 1.7 Q2 FORESTRY
M. Salim, D. Wulan, Sukmo Pinuji
{"title":"Reconciling community land and state forest claims in Indonesia: A case study of the Land Tenure Settlement Reconciliation Program in South Sumatra","authors":"M. Salim, D. Wulan, Sukmo Pinuji","doi":"10.24259/fs.v5i1.10552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Longstanding land tenure claims in state forest by communities continues to pose a challenge to government institutions in Indonesia. Such conditions require institutions to develop mechanisms to assure communities of their rights in the state ideals of manifest justice and welfare. One government policy to reconcile these goals is the mechanism on Land Tenure Settlement Reconciliation in State Forests (Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan/PPTKH). This study aims to describe this policy in the context of fieldwork experience related to fundamental problems in the process of identification and settlement of land tenure claimed by communities in state forests. Data collection was obtained through participant observation conducted with communities in Ogan Kemoring Ulu Regency by identifying and verifying community lands in state forests. This method allowed for a more nuanced understanding of settlement challenges and afforded the opportunity to develop a formula for addressing conflicts. The results of the study show that the main problems are a lack of access to information related to the PPTKH policy emergent from ineffective dissemination of information combined with an underdeveloped capacity of processes that support the community to convene and discuss with government actors, academics/researchers, and activists/scholars. The participative learning process conducted by the authors helped the community effectively prepare documents to propose to an Inventory and Verification (Inver) team of Land Tenure in State Forests. Therefore, going forward more collaborative work is needed within the framework of community assistance and capacity building so that the communities have the means and resources to able to understand the challenges of land tenure recognition and be empowered to propose such mechanisms independently. Communities who claim land in state forests depend upon formalized legality, without which can potentially harm their access and assets.","PeriodicalId":43213,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Society","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.10552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Longstanding land tenure claims in state forest by communities continues to pose a challenge to government institutions in Indonesia. Such conditions require institutions to develop mechanisms to assure communities of their rights in the state ideals of manifest justice and welfare. One government policy to reconcile these goals is the mechanism on Land Tenure Settlement Reconciliation in State Forests (Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan/PPTKH). This study aims to describe this policy in the context of fieldwork experience related to fundamental problems in the process of identification and settlement of land tenure claimed by communities in state forests. Data collection was obtained through participant observation conducted with communities in Ogan Kemoring Ulu Regency by identifying and verifying community lands in state forests. This method allowed for a more nuanced understanding of settlement challenges and afforded the opportunity to develop a formula for addressing conflicts. The results of the study show that the main problems are a lack of access to information related to the PPTKH policy emergent from ineffective dissemination of information combined with an underdeveloped capacity of processes that support the community to convene and discuss with government actors, academics/researchers, and activists/scholars. The participative learning process conducted by the authors helped the community effectively prepare documents to propose to an Inventory and Verification (Inver) team of Land Tenure in State Forests. Therefore, going forward more collaborative work is needed within the framework of community assistance and capacity building so that the communities have the means and resources to able to understand the challenges of land tenure recognition and be empowered to propose such mechanisms independently. Communities who claim land in state forests depend upon formalized legality, without which can potentially harm their access and assets.
印度尼西亚社区土地与国家森林权利的和解:南苏门答腊岛土地权属和解项目的案例研究
社区对国有森林的长期土地所有权要求继续对印度尼西亚的政府机构构成挑战。这种情况要求机构发展机制,以确保社区在国家理想中享有明显的正义和福利。调和这些目标的一项政府政策是国家森林土地权属和解机制(Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan/PPTKH)。本研究的目的是在实地工作经验的背景下描述这一政策,这些实地工作经验与确定和解决社区在国家森林中主张的土地所有权过程中的基本问题有关。数据收集是通过在Ogan Kemoring Ulu县的社区进行参与性观察,通过确定和核实国家森林中的社区土地获得的。这种方法使人们能够更细致地了解解决问题的挑战,并为制定解决冲突的方案提供了机会。研究结果表明,主要问题是缺乏获得与PPTKH政策相关的信息的途径,这是由于信息传播无效以及支持社区与政府行为者、学者/研究人员和活动家/学者召集和讨论的过程能力不发达造成的。作者进行的参与式学习过程帮助社区有效地准备了向国家森林土地权属清查和核查(Inver)小组提出建议的文件。因此,今后需要在社区援助和能力建设的框架内开展更多的协作工作,以便社区有手段和资源能够了解承认土地所有权的挑战,并有能力独立提出这种机制。在国家森林中拥有土地的社区依赖于正式的合法性,没有正式的合法性可能会损害他们的使用权和资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest and Society
Forest and Society FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
35.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信