Attention-direction versus retrieval practice: which fosters the productive recall of German formulaic sequences best?

IF 0.9 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Griet Boone, June Eyckmans
{"title":"Attention-direction versus retrieval practice: which fosters the productive recall of German formulaic sequences best?","authors":"Griet Boone, June Eyckmans","doi":"10.35869/vial.v0i17.1463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a classroom-based (quasi)-experiment with a pre-test post-test design that explored the effect of two types of activities on the productive recall of German formulaic sequences (FS): 1) attention-directing activities and 2) retrieval practice. Two intact classes of Dutch-speaking university students of German participated in the study. One class was randomly assigned to the attention-directing condition (n=18), the other one to the retrieval condition (n=11). Twenty-two target FS were selected as learning items. Each group processed the FS in a different condition. In the attention-directing condition, students had to 1) re-read a video transcript with the FS in bold typeface and 2) translate the targets into Dutch. In the retrieval condition, students had to 1) complete a transcript in which the FS were deleted and 2) translate the targets into German. Results indicate that the retrieval condition led to better productive phrase learning than the attention-directing condition.","PeriodicalId":42598,"journal":{"name":"Vial-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"19 1","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vial-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i17.1463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on a classroom-based (quasi)-experiment with a pre-test post-test design that explored the effect of two types of activities on the productive recall of German formulaic sequences (FS): 1) attention-directing activities and 2) retrieval practice. Two intact classes of Dutch-speaking university students of German participated in the study. One class was randomly assigned to the attention-directing condition (n=18), the other one to the retrieval condition (n=11). Twenty-two target FS were selected as learning items. Each group processed the FS in a different condition. In the attention-directing condition, students had to 1) re-read a video transcript with the FS in bold typeface and 2) translate the targets into Dutch. In the retrieval condition, students had to 1) complete a transcript in which the FS were deleted and 2) translate the targets into German. Results indicate that the retrieval condition led to better productive phrase learning than the attention-directing condition.
注意方向与检索练习:哪个最能促进德语公式化序列的生产性回忆?
本文报道了一项基于课堂的准实验,采用前测后测设计,探讨了两种类型的活动对德国公式化序列(FS)生产性回忆的影响:1)注意引导活动和2)检索练习。两个完整的荷兰语德语大学生班级参与了这项研究。一组随机分配到注意引导组(n=18),另一组随机分配到检索组(n=11)。选取22个目标FS作为学习项目。各组在不同条件下处理FS。在注意力引导条件下,学生们必须1)重读一段粗体的视频文本,2)将目标翻译成荷兰语。在检索条件下,学生必须1)完成一份删除FS的成绩单,2)将目标翻译成德语。结果表明,检索条件比注意引导条件更能促进生产性短语学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信