Exiting from Lockdowns: Early Evidence from Reopenings in Europe

J. Franks, Bertrand Gruss, Carlos Mulas Granados, Manasa Patnam, S. Weber
{"title":"Exiting from Lockdowns: Early Evidence from Reopenings in Europe","authors":"J. Franks, Bertrand Gruss, Carlos Mulas Granados, Manasa Patnam, S. Weber","doi":"10.5089/9781513559704.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European authorities introduced stringent lockdown measures in early 2020 to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. As the first wave of infection curves flattened and the outbreak appeared controlled, most countries started to reopen their economies albeit using diverse strategies. This paper introduces a novel daily database of sectoral reopening measures in Europe during the first-wave and documents that country plans differed significantly in terms of timing, pace, and sequencing of sectoral reopening measures. We then show that reopenings led to a recovery in mobility—a proxy for economic activity—but at the cost of somewhat higher infections. However, the experience with reopening reveals some original dimensions of this trade-off. First, the increase in COVID-19 infections after reopening appears less severe in fatality rates. Second, a given reopening step is associated with a worse reinfection outcome in countries that started reopening earlier on the infection curve or that opened all sectors at a fast pace in a relatively short time. Finally, while opening measures tend to have an amplification effect on subsequent cases when a large fraction of the economy is already open, this effect appears heterogenous across sectors.","PeriodicalId":14326,"journal":{"name":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513559704.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

European authorities introduced stringent lockdown measures in early 2020 to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. As the first wave of infection curves flattened and the outbreak appeared controlled, most countries started to reopen their economies albeit using diverse strategies. This paper introduces a novel daily database of sectoral reopening measures in Europe during the first-wave and documents that country plans differed significantly in terms of timing, pace, and sequencing of sectoral reopening measures. We then show that reopenings led to a recovery in mobility—a proxy for economic activity—but at the cost of somewhat higher infections. However, the experience with reopening reveals some original dimensions of this trade-off. First, the increase in COVID-19 infections after reopening appears less severe in fatality rates. Second, a given reopening step is associated with a worse reinfection outcome in countries that started reopening earlier on the infection curve or that opened all sectors at a fast pace in a relatively short time. Finally, while opening measures tend to have an amplification effect on subsequent cases when a large fraction of the economy is already open, this effect appears heterogenous across sectors.
解除封锁:来自欧洲重新开放的早期证据
欧洲当局在2020年初采取了严格的封锁措施,以减少COVID-19的传播。随着第一波感染曲线趋于平缓,疫情似乎得到控制,大多数国家开始重新开放经济,尽管采取了不同的策略。本文介绍了第一波期间欧洲部门重新开放措施的一个新的每日数据库,并证明各国计划在部门重新开放措施的时间、速度和顺序方面存在显著差异。然后我们表明,重新开放导致了流动性的恢复——经济活动的一个代表——但代价是更高的感染。然而,重新开业的经历揭示了这种权衡的一些原始维度。首先,重新开放后COVID-19感染的增加在死亡率方面似乎不那么严重。其次,在感染曲线上较早开始重新开放或在相对较短时间内快速开放所有部门的国家,特定的重新开放步骤与更糟糕的再感染结果相关。最后,虽然开放措施往往会在经济中很大一部分已经开放的后续情况下产生放大效应,但这种效应在各个部门之间似乎存在异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信