Adjusting the focus: looking at Patagonia and the wider Argentine state through the lens of settler colonial theory

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Geraldine Lublin
{"title":"Adjusting the focus: looking at Patagonia and the wider Argentine state through the lens of settler colonial theory","authors":"Geraldine Lublin","doi":"10.1080/2201473X.2021.2001961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Notwithstanding predictions about the exhaustion of the so-called Myth of White Argentina, recent developments signal the continuing vitality of Argentina’s European creation myth. How can it be that, despite the victories secured by more than three decades of Indigenous and Afrodescendant activism, it may prove so hard to topple? This article borrows insights from settler colonial theory to address the endurance of the Myth of Whiteness in Argentina not only as a discursive construction of racial domination but also as a fundamental structure that obscures the shady claims of the Argentine state to the land it occupies. As well as investigating the explanatory power of the analytical framework for the particular case, the article unpicks the layers contained in the narrative of White Argentina, drawing attention to the crucial role the European creation myth has played not only in Argentine history but most importantly in the current cycle of ‘progressive neoextractivism’. Contextualising Argentina within settler colonial studies also contributes to debunking accounts of Argentinean exceptionalism by locating Argentina within global logics of settler colonial domination and providing a wider framework which may help identify illuminating commonalities in the international context.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"386 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Settler Colonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2021.2001961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Notwithstanding predictions about the exhaustion of the so-called Myth of White Argentina, recent developments signal the continuing vitality of Argentina’s European creation myth. How can it be that, despite the victories secured by more than three decades of Indigenous and Afrodescendant activism, it may prove so hard to topple? This article borrows insights from settler colonial theory to address the endurance of the Myth of Whiteness in Argentina not only as a discursive construction of racial domination but also as a fundamental structure that obscures the shady claims of the Argentine state to the land it occupies. As well as investigating the explanatory power of the analytical framework for the particular case, the article unpicks the layers contained in the narrative of White Argentina, drawing attention to the crucial role the European creation myth has played not only in Argentine history but most importantly in the current cycle of ‘progressive neoextractivism’. Contextualising Argentina within settler colonial studies also contributes to debunking accounts of Argentinean exceptionalism by locating Argentina within global logics of settler colonial domination and providing a wider framework which may help identify illuminating commonalities in the international context.
调整焦点:通过定居者殖民理论的镜头看巴塔哥尼亚和更广泛的阿根廷国家
尽管有人预言所谓的“白色阿根廷神话”即将耗尽,但最近的事态发展表明,阿根廷的欧洲创造神话仍然充满活力。尽管30多年来土著人和非洲人后裔的激进主义取得了胜利,但为什么要推翻它却如此之难?本文借用定居者殖民理论的见解来探讨阿根廷白人神话的持久性,这不仅是一种种族统治的话语建构,也是一种基本结构,掩盖了阿根廷国家对其所占据土地的阴暗主张。除了调查特定案例分析框架的解释力外,本文还拆解了白色阿根廷叙事中包含的层次,提请注意欧洲创造神话不仅在阿根廷历史上发挥了关键作用,而且最重要的是在当前的“进步新提取主义”周期中发挥了重要作用。将阿根廷置于移民殖民研究的背景下,将阿根廷置于移民殖民统治的全球逻辑中,并提供一个更广泛的框架,有助于在国际背景下确定具有启发性的共性,从而有助于揭穿阿根廷例外论的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Settler Colonial Studies
Settler Colonial Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The journal aims to establish settler colonial studies as a distinct field of scholarly research. Scholars and students will find and contribute to historically-oriented research and analyses covering contemporary issues. We also aim to present multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, involving areas like history, law, genocide studies, indigenous, colonial and postcolonial studies, anthropology, historical geography, economics, politics, sociology, international relations, political science, literary criticism, cultural and gender studies and philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信