Sovereignty, Reason, and Will: Carl Schmitt and Hasidic Legal Thought

IF 0.6 0 RELIGION

Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1017/jlr.2022.14

Zalman Rothschild

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The decisionistic strand in Jewish legal philosophy is often neglected by scholars focused on the more common rational explanations for Jewish law. This article brings attention to decisionism in Jewish legal thought by analyzing the legal philosophy of Shneur Zalman of Lyady, the founder of the Habad Hasidic movement. The author uses the legal and political thought of Carl Schmitt—arguably modernity’s most influential decisionist—to help elucidate Shneur Zalman’s decisionistic legal thought and thereby put into sharper focus an otherwise underappreciated current in Jewish legal philosophy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

主权、理性与意志:卡尔·施密特与哈西德派法律思想

犹太法哲学中的决策主义倾向往往被关注犹太法的普遍理性解释的学者所忽视。本文通过分析哈西德派运动创始人莱亚迪的沙尔·扎尔曼(Shneur Zalman)的法律哲学，来关注犹太法律思想中的决策主义。作者运用卡尔·施密特(Carl schmitt)——可以说是现代最有影响力的决策学家——的法律和政治思想，来帮助阐明Shneur Zalman的决策主义法律思想，从而更清晰地关注犹太法律哲学中一个被低估的潮流。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law and Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Law and Religion publishes cutting-edge research on religion, human rights, and religious freedom; religion-state relations; religious sources and dimensions of public, private, penal, and procedural law; religious legal systems and their place in secular law; theological jurisprudence; political theology; legal and religious ethics; and more. The Journal provides a distinguished forum for deep dialogue among Buddhist, Confucian, Christian, Hindu, Indigenous, Jewish, Muslim, and other faith traditions about fundamental questions of law, society, and politics.