Simulation of Airflow Patterns and Aerodynamic Forces on a Chambered Airfoil and Symmetric Airfoil with Maximum Thickness Variation

I. G. Kartana, Anak Agung Adhi Suryanwan, I Gusti Ketut Sukadana
{"title":"Simulation of Airflow Patterns and Aerodynamic Forces on a Chambered Airfoil and Symmetric Airfoil with Maximum Thickness Variation","authors":"I. G. Kartana, Anak Agung Adhi Suryanwan, I Gusti Ketut Sukadana","doi":"10.37275/nasetjournal.v3i1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flow across the airfoil can cause drag and lift forces. The difference in pressure between the top and bottom surfaces of the airfoil creates a force that is perpendicular to the flow of fluid, and this force is called the lift force, and parallel to the flow is called the drag force. The author conducted research on simulating airflow patterns across the airfoil with maximum thickness variations. In this research, the simulation method is CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamic) using ANSYS Fluent software. The solution or solver method used in this simulation is the SIMPLE (Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equation) scheme. The flow pattern is shown by the streamline formed on the symmetric airfoil for α=0°, which will be symmetric, as well as the separation on the two sides, both the upper and lower sides. In contrast to the chambered airfoil, flow separation occurs only on the upper side. This indicates that there will be a pressure difference on the upper side and lower side so that the lift force can occur even though α=0°, because the lower side shows the pressure side. The greater the maximum thickness, the faster flow separation occurs. Then the higher the velocity value, the flow separation will be delayed due to an increase in the momentum of the working fluid flow, which overcomes the shear stress that occurs. At the angle of attack α=0°, the greater the maximum thickness of the chambered airfoil produces a greater lift force, while the symmetric airfoil does not produce lift.","PeriodicalId":19046,"journal":{"name":"Natural Sciences Engineering and Technology Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Sciences Engineering and Technology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37275/nasetjournal.v3i1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow across the airfoil can cause drag and lift forces. The difference in pressure between the top and bottom surfaces of the airfoil creates a force that is perpendicular to the flow of fluid, and this force is called the lift force, and parallel to the flow is called the drag force. The author conducted research on simulating airflow patterns across the airfoil with maximum thickness variations. In this research, the simulation method is CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamic) using ANSYS Fluent software. The solution or solver method used in this simulation is the SIMPLE (Semi Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equation) scheme. The flow pattern is shown by the streamline formed on the symmetric airfoil for α=0°, which will be symmetric, as well as the separation on the two sides, both the upper and lower sides. In contrast to the chambered airfoil, flow separation occurs only on the upper side. This indicates that there will be a pressure difference on the upper side and lower side so that the lift force can occur even though α=0°, because the lower side shows the pressure side. The greater the maximum thickness, the faster flow separation occurs. Then the higher the velocity value, the flow separation will be delayed due to an increase in the momentum of the working fluid flow, which overcomes the shear stress that occurs. At the angle of attack α=0°, the greater the maximum thickness of the chambered airfoil produces a greater lift force, while the symmetric airfoil does not produce lift.
模拟气流模式和空气动力对一个室翼型和对称翼型与最大厚度变化
气流穿过翼型会造成阻力和升力。翼型的顶部和底部表面之间的压力差产生了一种垂直于流体流动的力,这种力称为升力,平行于流体流动的力称为阻力。作者进行了模拟气流模式的研究横跨最大厚度变化的翼型。本研究采用CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamic,计算流体动力学)仿真方法,采用ANSYS Fluent软件。在此模拟中使用的解或求解器方法是SIMPLE(压力链接方程的半隐式方法)格式。流动模式是由流线上形成的对称翼型为α=0°,这将是对称的,以及两侧的分离,无论是上侧和下侧。在对比室翼型,流动分离只发生在上部。这表明,即使α=0°,上下侧也会存在压力差,因此升力可以发生,因为下侧显示压力侧。最大厚度越大,流动分离越快。那么速度值越高,由于工作流体流动动量的增加,流动分离将被推迟,这克服了所发生的剪切应力。在迎角α=0°,更大的最大厚度的室翼型产生更大的升力,而对称翼型不产生升力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信