COMMUNICATIONS ENCRYPTION AS AN INVESTIGATIVE OBSTACLE

M. Pisarić
{"title":"COMMUNICATIONS ENCRYPTION AS AN INVESTIGATIVE OBSTACLE","authors":"M. Pisarić","doi":"10.47152/rkkp.60.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to novel technology solutions, primarily peer­to­peer, encryption and service providers located abroad, the ability of the law enforcement agencies to execute legally authorized traditional (even special) investigatory means is becoming increasingly problematic. Communication encryption, particularly end­to­end encryption in smartphone applications hinders law enforcement authorities’ practical ability to wiretap communications, although in a legal position. This phenomenon is globally recognized as “Going Dark” problem. All these challenges have necessitated legislative action. So far two different approaches have been recognized in addressing this problem: mandatory exceptional access and legalized hacking of target. In this paper we explore the viability and implications of both of them, in order to identity the most viable solution for overcoming investigative barrier, i.e. enabling the authorities to conduct surveillance of electronic communications.","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.60.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Due to novel technology solutions, primarily peer­to­peer, encryption and service providers located abroad, the ability of the law enforcement agencies to execute legally authorized traditional (even special) investigatory means is becoming increasingly problematic. Communication encryption, particularly end­to­end encryption in smartphone applications hinders law enforcement authorities’ practical ability to wiretap communications, although in a legal position. This phenomenon is globally recognized as “Going Dark” problem. All these challenges have necessitated legislative action. So far two different approaches have been recognized in addressing this problem: mandatory exceptional access and legalized hacking of target. In this paper we explore the viability and implications of both of them, in order to identity the most viable solution for overcoming investigative barrier, i.e. enabling the authorities to conduct surveillance of electronic communications.
通信加密是调查的障碍
由于新的技术解决方案,主要是点对点,加密和服务提供商位于国外,执法机构执行合法授权的传统(甚至特殊)调查手段的能力正变得越来越成问题。通信加密,特别是智能手机应用程序中的端到端加密,阻碍了执法当局窃听通信的实际能力,尽管这是合法的。这种现象被全球公认为“走向黑暗”问题。所有这些挑战都需要采取立法行动。到目前为止,解决这个问题的两种不同的方法是公认的:强制例外访问和合法的黑客攻击目标。在本文中,我们探讨了两者的可行性和影响,以确定克服调查障碍的最可行的解决方案,即使当局能够对电子通信进行监视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信