Peer Review in Biology: Of Novices, Experts, and Disciplines

C. Donahue, L. Foster-Johnson
{"title":"Peer Review in Biology: Of Novices, Experts, and Disciplines","authors":"C. Donahue, L. Foster-Johnson","doi":"10.37514/jwa-j.2019.3.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• Background: In 2015, five institutions with nationally recognized writing programs and STEM disciplines received funding by the National Science Foundation to implement peer review activity in STEM courses. As part of that larger project, this study examined the context and content of peer feedback for entry-level and advanced biology courses and compared the key terms used in these peer reviews to terms used by peer reviewers in chemistry and words identified as “high-quality” by writing experts.","PeriodicalId":92857,"journal":{"name":"The journal of writing analytics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of writing analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/jwa-j.2019.3.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

• Background: In 2015, five institutions with nationally recognized writing programs and STEM disciplines received funding by the National Science Foundation to implement peer review activity in STEM courses. As part of that larger project, this study examined the context and content of peer feedback for entry-level and advanced biology courses and compared the key terms used in these peer reviews to terms used by peer reviewers in chemistry and words identified as “high-quality” by writing experts.
生物学的同行评议:新手、专家和学科
•背景:2015年,五所拥有国家认可的写作项目和STEM学科的机构获得了美国国家科学基金会的资助,在STEM课程中实施同行评议活动。作为这个更大项目的一部分,这项研究检查了初级和高级生物学课程的同行反馈的背景和内容,并将这些同行评议中使用的关键术语与同行评议者在化学中使用的术语和被写作专家认定为“高质量”的词汇进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书