Anti-Asian microaggressions in the time of COVID-19: Impact on coping, stress, and well-being.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Xiaodi Yan, Yi Zhu, S. A. Hussain, M. Bresnahan
{"title":"Anti-Asian microaggressions in the time of COVID-19: Impact on coping, stress, and well-being.","authors":"Xiaodi Yan, Yi Zhu, S. A. Hussain, M. Bresnahan","doi":"10.1037/aap0000281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the public significance of this article? East Asian Americans confronted with anti-Asian microaggressions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic who engaged with the aggressor had more stress, but better mental health outcomes compared to participants who ignored microaggressions. An unanticipated outcome of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been increased Sinophobia directed toward Asian Americans. The present study used a mixed-methods design and investigated how 345 East Asian Americans responded to COVID-19-related microaggressions and how their responses affected stress and well-being. The qualitative data included 196 narratives describing anti-Asian microaggressions experienced by participants during COVID-19. Four themes emerged from narratives including nonverbal rejection responses, verbal rejection, physical assault, and exposure to aggression on the social media. Additionally, quantitative data collected participants' responses to scales measuring microaggressions, personal resilience, social support, coping strategies (engagement and disengagement coping), stress, and psychological well-being. Path analysis showed that participants who reported more microaggressions experienced significantly more stress. Participants with more social support had better psychological well-being. Those with stronger personal resilience were more likely to use engagement coping. Even though engagement coping was associated with more stress, confronting aggressors was also associated with better psychological well-being compared to ignoring the threat (disengagement coping). Implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46922,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

What is the public significance of this article? East Asian Americans confronted with anti-Asian microaggressions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic who engaged with the aggressor had more stress, but better mental health outcomes compared to participants who ignored microaggressions. An unanticipated outcome of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been increased Sinophobia directed toward Asian Americans. The present study used a mixed-methods design and investigated how 345 East Asian Americans responded to COVID-19-related microaggressions and how their responses affected stress and well-being. The qualitative data included 196 narratives describing anti-Asian microaggressions experienced by participants during COVID-19. Four themes emerged from narratives including nonverbal rejection responses, verbal rejection, physical assault, and exposure to aggression on the social media. Additionally, quantitative data collected participants' responses to scales measuring microaggressions, personal resilience, social support, coping strategies (engagement and disengagement coping), stress, and psychological well-being. Path analysis showed that participants who reported more microaggressions experienced significantly more stress. Participants with more social support had better psychological well-being. Those with stronger personal resilience were more likely to use engagement coping. Even though engagement coping was associated with more stress, confronting aggressors was also associated with better psychological well-being compared to ignoring the threat (disengagement coping). Implications of these findings are discussed.
COVID-19时期的反亚洲微侵犯:对应对、压力和福祉的影响。
这篇文章的公共意义是什么?在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,与侵略者接触的东亚美国人面临反亚洲的微侵犯,与忽视微侵犯的参与者相比,他们的压力更大,但心理健康结果更好。冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的一个意想不到的结果是,针对亚裔美国人的恐华症加剧。本研究采用混合方法设计,调查了345名东亚美国人如何应对与covid -19相关的微侵犯,以及他们的反应如何影响压力和幸福感。定性数据包括196个描述参与者在COVID-19期间经历的反亚洲微侵犯的叙述。叙述中出现了四个主题,包括非语言拒绝反应、语言拒绝、身体攻击和在社交媒体上受到攻击。此外,定量数据收集了参与者对微侵犯、个人弹性、社会支持、应对策略(参与和脱离应对)、压力和心理健康的反应。通径分析显示,报告微侵犯行为较多的参与者承受的压力明显更大。社会支持越多的参与者心理健康状况越好。那些个人适应力较强的人更有可能使用投入应对。尽管参与应对与更多的压力有关,但与忽视威胁(脱离应对)相比,面对攻击者也与更好的心理健康有关。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信