The Outcome of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly

A. Faraj, P. Hussain, K. Velusamy
{"title":"The Outcome of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly","authors":"A. Faraj, P. Hussain, K. Velusamy","doi":"10.23937/2474-3674/1510080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of Garden type 1 and 2 undisplaced proximal femoral intracapsular fracture in elderly patients is controversial. Many options including arthroplasty and fixation have been suggested based on patient's age and cognitive function. We have retrospectively reviewed 85 elderly patients with undisplaced femoral neck fracture. The mean age of the cohort was 81 years. 52 patients were treated with cemented hemi-arthroplasty, 19 with dynamic hip screw fixation, 10 had cannulated screw fixation, total hip replacement in 3, and conservative management for one patient. We reviewed the cohort for a mean period of 3 years and we looked into their general complications, local complications related to the hip and mortality. and 32% with Dynamic Hip screw), had good outcome. All the patients treated using total hip replacement, the patient treated conservatively, also had good outcome and 56% of the fixation group had poor outcome. The good results of hemiarthroplasty were predictable for patients with ASA III (27), and ASA IV (11). Patients chosen to have THR had better ASA grade than the remaining. In general the outcome in arthroplasty group was superior to the DHS and cannulated screws. Conclusion: From the study it is clearly evident that arthroplasty provides better outcome for elderly patients with undispalced femoral neck fracture especially with poor cognitive function.","PeriodicalId":13937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of Garden type 1 and 2 undisplaced proximal femoral intracapsular fracture in elderly patients is controversial. Many options including arthroplasty and fixation have been suggested based on patient's age and cognitive function. We have retrospectively reviewed 85 elderly patients with undisplaced femoral neck fracture. The mean age of the cohort was 81 years. 52 patients were treated with cemented hemi-arthroplasty, 19 with dynamic hip screw fixation, 10 had cannulated screw fixation, total hip replacement in 3, and conservative management for one patient. We reviewed the cohort for a mean period of 3 years and we looked into their general complications, local complications related to the hip and mortality. and 32% with Dynamic Hip screw), had good outcome. All the patients treated using total hip replacement, the patient treated conservatively, also had good outcome and 56% of the fixation group had poor outcome. The good results of hemiarthroplasty were predictable for patients with ASA III (27), and ASA IV (11). Patients chosen to have THR had better ASA grade than the remaining. In general the outcome in arthroplasty group was superior to the DHS and cannulated screws. Conclusion: From the study it is clearly evident that arthroplasty provides better outcome for elderly patients with undispalced femoral neck fracture especially with poor cognitive function.
老年股骨颈未移位骨折的预后分析
老年Garden型1型和2型未移位股骨近端囊内骨折的处理存在争议。根据患者的年龄和认知功能,提出了包括关节置换术和固定在内的许多选择。我们回顾性分析了85例老年股骨颈未移位骨折患者。该队列的平均年龄为81岁。52例采用骨水泥半关节置换术,19例采用动力螺钉固定,10例采用空心螺钉固定,3例采用全髋关节置换术,1例采用保守治疗。我们回顾了平均3年的队列研究了他们的一般并发症,与髋关节相关的局部并发症和死亡率。32%采用动力髋螺钉),结果良好。所有采用全髋关节置换术治疗的患者,保守治疗的患者也有良好的预后,56%的固定组预后较差。对于ASA III型(27)和ASA IV型(11)患者,半关节置换术的良好结果是可预测的。选择THR的患者比其他患者有更好的ASA等级。总的来说,关节置换术组的结果优于DHS和空心螺钉。结论:本研究清楚地表明,关节置换术对老年未移位股骨颈骨折患者尤其是认知功能较差的患者有较好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信