Quality Assessment of Hand Hygiene and Effectiveness of WHO 6 Step Training among Healthcare Personnel in a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital in Trivandrum, India: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Deepthi J Prabhu, Munish Palliyalil Kakkolil, Divya V. Gladston, R. Koshy, J. Krishna, A. Mathew
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Hand Hygiene and Effectiveness of WHO 6 Step Training among Healthcare Personnel in a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital in Trivandrum, India: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Deepthi J Prabhu, Munish Palliyalil Kakkolil, Divya V. Gladston, R. Koshy, J. Krishna, A. Mathew","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/63108.18057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) 6 steps for effective Hand Hygiene (HH) practice to prevent cross infections emphasises on coverage of all aspects of the hand with the Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR). The quality of hand rubbing usually remains un-monitored among healthcare workers. Hence, interventions to ensure both compliance and quality combined with periodic training would fill the deficiency in these practices in the healthcare setting. Aim: To analyse the quality of HH using an Ultraviolet (UV) sensitive ABHR among healthcare workers in the Operation Theatre (OT) and post-surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. Study population included 104 healthcare providers in the OT and post-surgical ICU, over a period of two months, from June 2017 to July 2017. Participants were asked to disinfect their hands according to WHO 6 steps using an ABHR to which an UV light sensitive pigment was added, and then place them in an UV light sensitive cabinet. Digital images of both sides of their hands were recorded. Every area of the hand not covered by the hand rub appeared as a dark spot and was considered an error. Pass criteria allowed a maximum of two small uncovered areas (dark spots <0.6 cm2 ) on the dorsal side of the hand and no uncovered areas on the palmar aspect. Each hand was observed specifically at four areas and the most missed areas were identified. Statistical analysis was done by Fisher’sexact test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28.0. Results: Out of the total 104 participants, 28 were doctors, 46 were nurses, 22 were nursing students and 8 were OT technicians. A total of 65 participants were males (62%) and 85 participants (82%) were in the 35-40 years age group. The HH was found to be better on the right hand in all the sub-groups studied. The difference in the hand rub coverage on all the four observed areas of the right hand was not significant. On the left-side, hygiene in between the fingers (p-value 0.012) and at the finger tips (p-value 0.007) was poorest. Among the groups studied, doctors performed better with a higher group score of 60.7% compared to 22.7% of that of nursing students (p-value 0.030). Conclusion: Quality of HH practice using ABHR among personnel involved in peri-operative care is poor and requires improvement with regular monitoring and training.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/63108.18057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) 6 steps for effective Hand Hygiene (HH) practice to prevent cross infections emphasises on coverage of all aspects of the hand with the Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR). The quality of hand rubbing usually remains un-monitored among healthcare workers. Hence, interventions to ensure both compliance and quality combined with periodic training would fill the deficiency in these practices in the healthcare setting. Aim: To analyse the quality of HH using an Ultraviolet (UV) sensitive ABHR among healthcare workers in the Operation Theatre (OT) and post-surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. Study population included 104 healthcare providers in the OT and post-surgical ICU, over a period of two months, from June 2017 to July 2017. Participants were asked to disinfect their hands according to WHO 6 steps using an ABHR to which an UV light sensitive pigment was added, and then place them in an UV light sensitive cabinet. Digital images of both sides of their hands were recorded. Every area of the hand not covered by the hand rub appeared as a dark spot and was considered an error. Pass criteria allowed a maximum of two small uncovered areas (dark spots <0.6 cm2 ) on the dorsal side of the hand and no uncovered areas on the palmar aspect. Each hand was observed specifically at four areas and the most missed areas were identified. Statistical analysis was done by Fisher’sexact test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28.0. Results: Out of the total 104 participants, 28 were doctors, 46 were nurses, 22 were nursing students and 8 were OT technicians. A total of 65 participants were males (62%) and 85 participants (82%) were in the 35-40 years age group. The HH was found to be better on the right hand in all the sub-groups studied. The difference in the hand rub coverage on all the four observed areas of the right hand was not significant. On the left-side, hygiene in between the fingers (p-value 0.012) and at the finger tips (p-value 0.007) was poorest. Among the groups studied, doctors performed better with a higher group score of 60.7% compared to 22.7% of that of nursing students (p-value 0.030). Conclusion: Quality of HH practice using ABHR among personnel involved in peri-operative care is poor and requires improvement with regular monitoring and training.
印度特里凡得勒姆三级肿瘤医院医护人员手部卫生质量评估和WHO 6步培训效果:一项横断面研究
导语:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)《防止交叉感染的有效手卫生六步骤》强调用含酒精的洗手液覆盖手的各个方面。卫生保健工作者的搓手质量通常不受监测。因此,确保合规性和质量的干预措施与定期培训相结合,将填补医疗保健环境中这些实践的不足。目的:分析手术室(OT)和术后重症监护病房(ICU)医护人员紫外线(UV)敏感ABHR的HH质量。材料和方法:本横断面研究在印度喀拉拉邦特里凡得琅地区癌症中心进行。研究人群包括2017年6月至2017年7月两个月期间的OT和术后ICU的104名医疗保健提供者。参与者被要求按照世卫组织的6个步骤,使用添加了紫外线感光色素的ABHR对双手进行消毒,然后将其放置在紫外线感光柜中。他们的双手两侧的数字图像被记录下来。每一个没有被搓手覆盖的手的区域都显示为一个黑点,被认为是一个错误。通过标准允许在手背侧最多有两个小的未覆盖区域(<0.6 cm2的黑点),手掌面没有未覆盖区域。每只手的四个部位都被观察到,最容易被忽略的部位被识别出来。统计分析采用Fisher精确检验,使用SPSS 28.0版本。结果:104名参与者中,医生28人,护士46人,护生22人,OT技术人员8人。共有65名参与者为男性(62%),85名参与者(82%)年龄在35-40岁之间。在研究的所有亚组中,HH在右手上表现更好。在所有四个观察区域的右手擦手覆盖率差异不显著。在左侧,手指之间(p值为0.012)和指尖(p值为0.007)的卫生状况最差。在研究组中,医生表现较好,组得分为60.7%,高于护生的22.7% (p值为0.030)。结论:围手术期护理人员使用ABHR的HH实践质量较差,需要通过定期监测和培训来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信