The smartphone scoliosis screening software for measuring the Cobb angle of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a reliability study

Yuepeng Song, Xinge Shi, Yanzheng Gao, Weiran Hu, Haohao Ma, Xiaonan Wu, Shuai Xing
{"title":"The smartphone scoliosis screening software for measuring the Cobb angle of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a reliability study","authors":"Yuepeng Song,&nbsp;Xinge Shi,&nbsp;Yanzheng Gao,&nbsp;Weiran Hu,&nbsp;Haohao Ma,&nbsp;Xiaonan Wu,&nbsp;Shuai Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.isurg.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the accuracy and repeatability of the software that we developed in measuring the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Cobb angle.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty patients with AIS were included in the study. Three independent surveyors measured the Cobb angle of coronal main curve, thoracic kyphosis angle (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis angle (TLK) and lumbar kyphosis angle (LL) by using protractor, scoliosis screening software and picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The measurement was repeated after an interval of 2 weeks. The measurement time of software method and protractor method were compared by Paired <em>t</em>-test. Taking the Cobb angle measurement results of the PACS as the reference standard. The repeatability of the surveyor and the consistency between the surveyors are compared by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 50 patients, there were 18 males and 32 females, aged from 10 to 18 years (mean age of 14.4 years). The time of measuring Cobb angle by software method was significantly shorter than that by protractor method (94.7 ​± ​8.5s versus 217.9 ​± ​24.1s, <em>t</em> ​= ​−60.536, <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle measured by software method and PACS method (all <em>P</em> ​&gt; ​0.05). The reliability analysis showed that the three surveyors used software to measure the Cobb angle of the coronal main curve, TK, TLK and LL were all in good consistency (ICC&gt;0.90). The repeatability and consistency of the software method used by the three surveyors were higher than that of the protractor method (ICC&gt; 0.90).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with traditional protractor, the smartphone scoliosis screening software has shorter time, higher efficiency, higher accuracy and repeatability in measuring Cobb angle of AIS, so as to widely screen the diagnosis of scoliosis patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100683,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Surgery","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666676622000011/pdfft?md5=d6cb0811e48cd2cd77475824b2bbb2d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666676622000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666676622000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the accuracy and repeatability of the software that we developed in measuring the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Cobb angle.

Methods

Fifty patients with AIS were included in the study. Three independent surveyors measured the Cobb angle of coronal main curve, thoracic kyphosis angle (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis angle (TLK) and lumbar kyphosis angle (LL) by using protractor, scoliosis screening software and picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The measurement was repeated after an interval of 2 weeks. The measurement time of software method and protractor method were compared by Paired t-test. Taking the Cobb angle measurement results of the PACS as the reference standard. The repeatability of the surveyor and the consistency between the surveyors are compared by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Among the 50 patients, there were 18 males and 32 females, aged from 10 to 18 years (mean age of 14.4 years). The time of measuring Cobb angle by software method was significantly shorter than that by protractor method (94.7 ​± ​8.5s versus 217.9 ​± ​24.1s, t ​= ​−60.536, P ​< ​0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle measured by software method and PACS method (all P ​> ​0.05). The reliability analysis showed that the three surveyors used software to measure the Cobb angle of the coronal main curve, TK, TLK and LL were all in good consistency (ICC>0.90). The repeatability and consistency of the software method used by the three surveyors were higher than that of the protractor method (ICC> 0.90).

Conclusions

Compared with traditional protractor, the smartphone scoliosis screening software has shorter time, higher efficiency, higher accuracy and repeatability in measuring Cobb angle of AIS, so as to widely screen the diagnosis of scoliosis patients.

智能手机脊柱侧凸筛查软件测量青少年特发性脊柱侧凸Cobb角的可靠性研究
目的探讨开发的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS) Cobb角测量软件的准确性和可重复性。方法选取50例AIS患者作为研究对象。3名独立测量员分别使用分度器、脊柱侧凸筛查软件和图片存档与通讯系统(PACS)测量冠状主曲线Cobb角、胸椎后凸角(TK)、胸腰椎后凸角(TLK)和腰椎后凸角(LL)。每隔2周重复测量一次。采用配对t检验比较软件法和量角器法的测量时间。以PACS的Cobb角测量结果为参考标准。用类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)来比较测量员的重复性和测量员之间的一致性。结果50例患者中,男性18例,女性32例,年龄10 ~ 18岁,平均14.4岁。软件法测量Cobb角的时间明显短于量角器法(94.7±8.5s vs 217.9±21.5 s), t = - 60.536, P <0.05)。软件法与PACS法测量的Cobb角无显著差异(P >0.05)。信度分析显示,3名测量表员均采用软件测量冠状主曲线Cobb角,TK、TLK、LL一致性较好(ICC>0.90)。三名测量员使用的软件方法的重复性和一致性均高于量规法(ICC>0.90)。结论与传统量尺相比,智能手机脊柱侧凸筛查软件测量AIS Cobb角的时间更短、效率更高、准确性和可重复性更高,可广泛筛查脊柱侧凸患者的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信