Multileaf-collimator daily quality assurance of Vero4DRT system: our one-year experience

H. Miura, S. Ozawa, S. Tsuda, K. Yamada, Y. Nagata
{"title":"Multileaf-collimator daily quality assurance of Vero4DRT system: our one-year experience","authors":"H. Miura, S. Ozawa, S. Tsuda, K. Yamada, Y. Nagata","doi":"10.14319/IJCTO.51.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We assessed the daily quality assurance (QA) of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) using the Vero4DRT system. Methods: As part of daily MLC QA, the irradiation field was set to 100 × 150 mm 2 with a gantry angle of 0 o. Only the leaf positioning error values only were displayed. We developed an in-house program to easily acquire these values using an open source optical character recognition engine. This test was implemented between 24 August 2015 and 23 August 2016. Results: The maximum leaf positioning error was 0.40 mm in both banks. In addition, the maximum deviation was 0.10 mm in both banks. The average and standard deviation for left and right banks were 0.19 mm ± 0.11 mm and 0.15 mm ± 0.09 mm, respectively. In our one-year measurement, the leaf positioning error was less than 0.50 mm. Therefore, if the leaf position error for daily MLC QA exceeded 0.50 mm, then an external intervention is required. Conclusion: The daily MLC QA of our one-year evaluation of the Vero4DRT system demonstrates an excellent leaf accuracy and reproducibility, thereby giving confidence in the quality of the treatment.","PeriodicalId":13931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14319/IJCTO.51.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the daily quality assurance (QA) of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) using the Vero4DRT system. Methods: As part of daily MLC QA, the irradiation field was set to 100 × 150 mm 2 with a gantry angle of 0 o. Only the leaf positioning error values only were displayed. We developed an in-house program to easily acquire these values using an open source optical character recognition engine. This test was implemented between 24 August 2015 and 23 August 2016. Results: The maximum leaf positioning error was 0.40 mm in both banks. In addition, the maximum deviation was 0.10 mm in both banks. The average and standard deviation for left and right banks were 0.19 mm ± 0.11 mm and 0.15 mm ± 0.09 mm, respectively. In our one-year measurement, the leaf positioning error was less than 0.50 mm. Therefore, if the leaf position error for daily MLC QA exceeded 0.50 mm, then an external intervention is required. Conclusion: The daily MLC QA of our one-year evaluation of the Vero4DRT system demonstrates an excellent leaf accuracy and reproducibility, thereby giving confidence in the quality of the treatment.
Vero4DRT系统多叶准直器日常质量保证:一年经验
目的:我们使用Vero4DRT系统评估多叶准直仪(MLC)的日常质量保证(QA)。方法:作为MLC日常QA的一部分,将照射场设置为100 × 150mm2,龙门角为0°,仅显示叶片定位误差值。我们开发了一个内部程序,使用开源光学字符识别引擎轻松获取这些值。该测试于2015年8月24日至2016年8月23日进行。结果:两种植物叶片定位误差均为0.40 mm。此外,两岸的最大偏差均为0.10 mm。左岸和右岸的平均值和标准差分别为0.19 mm±0.11 mm和0.15 mm±0.09 mm。在我们一年的测量中,叶片定位误差小于0.50 mm。因此,如果每日MLC QA的叶片位置误差超过0.50 mm,则需要外部干预。结论:我们对Vero4DRT系统进行了为期一年的评估,每日MLC QA显示出出色的叶片准确性和可重复性,从而对处理质量充满信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书