Partial discharge measurement in DC GIS: comparison between conventional and UHF methods

T. Vu-Cong, M. Dalstein, C. Toigo, F. Jacquier, A. Girodet
{"title":"Partial discharge measurement in DC GIS: comparison between conventional and UHF methods","authors":"T. Vu-Cong, M. Dalstein, C. Toigo, F. Jacquier, A. Girodet","doi":"10.1109/CEIDP50766.2021.9705420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detection, identification and localization of defects are essential to ensure the service reliability of Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS). Partial discharge (PD) measurement is well-known as one of the most effective technique for defect detection and identification in electrical insulation systems. PD measurement according to IEC standard 60270 is known as the conventional technique, in which PD is quantified in terms of apparent charge. Moreover, non-conventional technique, like UHF detection, can also be used for partial discharge measurement to enhance the signal/noise ratio in GIS. For AC electrical insulating systems both techniques are effectives, widely used and give the same signature of defect. Unfortunately, very little information is available for DC systems, especially regarding the comparison of the defect fingerprint between the two methods. The aim of this paper is to investigate the partial discharge signals recorded with both conventional and UHF methods in DC voltage. The results showed that the defect fingerprints are similar between the conventional measurement and the UHF measurement, regardless the UHF antenna position in the equipment.","PeriodicalId":6837,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","volume":"37 1","pages":"607-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP50766.2021.9705420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The detection, identification and localization of defects are essential to ensure the service reliability of Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS). Partial discharge (PD) measurement is well-known as one of the most effective technique for defect detection and identification in electrical insulation systems. PD measurement according to IEC standard 60270 is known as the conventional technique, in which PD is quantified in terms of apparent charge. Moreover, non-conventional technique, like UHF detection, can also be used for partial discharge measurement to enhance the signal/noise ratio in GIS. For AC electrical insulating systems both techniques are effectives, widely used and give the same signature of defect. Unfortunately, very little information is available for DC systems, especially regarding the comparison of the defect fingerprint between the two methods. The aim of this paper is to investigate the partial discharge signals recorded with both conventional and UHF methods in DC voltage. The results showed that the defect fingerprints are similar between the conventional measurement and the UHF measurement, regardless the UHF antenna position in the equipment.
直流GIS中的局部放电测量:常规与超高频方法的比较
缺陷的检测、识别和定位是保证气体绝缘开关设备(GIS)运行可靠性的关键。局部放电(PD)测量被认为是电气绝缘系统缺陷检测和识别的最有效技术之一。根据IEC标准60270的PD测量被称为常规技术,其中PD是根据视电荷来量化的。此外,超高频检测等非常规技术也可用于局部放电测量,以提高GIS的信噪比。对于交流电气绝缘系统,这两种技术都是有效的、广泛使用的,并且具有相同的缺陷特征。不幸的是,直流系统的信息很少,特别是关于两种方法之间缺陷指纹的比较。本文的目的是研究在直流电压下用常规方法和超高频方法记录的局部放电信号。结果表明,无论超高频天线在设备中的位置如何,常规测量和超高频测量的缺陷指纹都是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信