Lessons Learned from Adopting Sustainability Aspects for Gas Development Project

T. Asmoro, Hirmawan Eko Prabowo, A. Prayascitra
{"title":"Lessons Learned from Adopting Sustainability Aspects for Gas Development Project","authors":"T. Asmoro, Hirmawan Eko Prabowo, A. Prayascitra","doi":"10.2118/196247-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil and gas industry have started integrating sustainability approaches into their oil and operations mainly aiming to manage risks particularly in Environment and Social (E&S) aspects. It is also seen to be aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) where its main principles of sustainability have actually been adopted in the oil and gas activities. One of set of requirements that addresses sustainability aspects in a project is that Performance Standards (PS) developed by IFC (International Finance Corporation).\n IFC PS provides comprehensive standard of E&S practices which encourages transparency and positive contribution to environment and community. It has 8 elements, i.e. managing E&S risks and impacts (PS1), promoting safety and fair treatment of workers (PS2), avoiding pollution from project activities (PS3), managing risks to local communities (PS4), improving livelihoods of displaced persons (PS5), managing living natural resources sustainably (PS6), and protecting the indigenous peoples (PS7) and cultural heritage (PS8).\n Adopting IFC PS has been mostly becoming compulsory nowadays when dealing with financial institutions to support a project financing. This is also known as green financing where a project must adhere with a set of E&S requirements in managing project risks especially in E&S sides. Implementing IFC PS is such a challenging thing when the project has unique characteristics, e.g. located in post-conflict area, no major project in the past decade, and some unpleasant images perceived by the communities from the former operator.\n This paper will discuss lessons learned from implementing IFC PS in a gas development project and developing management system adopted from them, e.g. stakeholder engagement, grievance mechanism, livelihood restoration and environment management. It will also investigate the gaps between aspects in IFC PS and Government regulation, and finally bridge them accordingly. As a result, implementation of management system has helped manage the risks and improve project's performance and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10927,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196247-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Oil and gas industry have started integrating sustainability approaches into their oil and operations mainly aiming to manage risks particularly in Environment and Social (E&S) aspects. It is also seen to be aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) where its main principles of sustainability have actually been adopted in the oil and gas activities. One of set of requirements that addresses sustainability aspects in a project is that Performance Standards (PS) developed by IFC (International Finance Corporation). IFC PS provides comprehensive standard of E&S practices which encourages transparency and positive contribution to environment and community. It has 8 elements, i.e. managing E&S risks and impacts (PS1), promoting safety and fair treatment of workers (PS2), avoiding pollution from project activities (PS3), managing risks to local communities (PS4), improving livelihoods of displaced persons (PS5), managing living natural resources sustainably (PS6), and protecting the indigenous peoples (PS7) and cultural heritage (PS8). Adopting IFC PS has been mostly becoming compulsory nowadays when dealing with financial institutions to support a project financing. This is also known as green financing where a project must adhere with a set of E&S requirements in managing project risks especially in E&S sides. Implementing IFC PS is such a challenging thing when the project has unique characteristics, e.g. located in post-conflict area, no major project in the past decade, and some unpleasant images perceived by the communities from the former operator. This paper will discuss lessons learned from implementing IFC PS in a gas development project and developing management system adopted from them, e.g. stakeholder engagement, grievance mechanism, livelihood restoration and environment management. It will also investigate the gaps between aspects in IFC PS and Government regulation, and finally bridge them accordingly. As a result, implementation of management system has helped manage the risks and improve project's performance and outcomes.
天然气开发项目采用可持续性的经验教训
石油和天然气行业已经开始将可持续发展方法纳入其石油和运营中,主要旨在管理环境和社会(E&S)方面的风险。它也被认为与可持续发展目标(sdg)保持一致,其可持续性的主要原则实际上已被石油和天然气活动所采用。解决项目可持续性问题的一系列要求之一是国际金融公司制定的绩效标准(PS)。IFC PS提供全面的环境与安全实践标准,鼓励透明度和对环境和社区的积极贡献。它有8个要素,即管理E&S风险和影响(PS1),促进工人的安全和公平待遇(PS2),避免项目活动造成的污染(PS3),管理当地社区的风险(PS4),改善流离失所者的生计(PS5),可持续地管理自然资源(PS6),保护土著人民(PS7)和文化遗产(PS8)。如今,在与金融机构打交道以支持项目融资时,采用国际金融公司PS基本上已成为强制性的。这也被称为绿色融资,项目在管理项目风险方面必须遵守一套环境与安全要求,特别是在环境与安全方面。实施国际金融公司PS是一件具有挑战性的事情,因为项目具有独特的特点,例如位于冲突后地区,过去十年没有大型项目,以及社区对前运营商的一些不愉快印象。本文将讨论在天然气开发项目中实施国际金融公司PS的经验教训,以及从中借鉴的管理系统,如利益相关者参与、申诉机制、生计恢复和环境管理。它还将调查国际金融公司PS与政府监管之间的差距,并最终相应地弥合这些差距。因此,管理体系的实施有助于管理风险,提高项目的绩效和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信