Sports system in the independent state of the Republic of Serbia: From the prudent beginning to the exhausting state interventionism

B. Jevtić
{"title":"Sports system in the independent state of the Republic of Serbia: From the prudent beginning to the exhausting state interventionism","authors":"B. Jevtić","doi":"10.5937/FIZKUL1901003J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper were the changes in the National Sports System (NSS) lasting since the Republic of Serbia gained its full state independence (in May 2006) until present. National sports organizations have initiated those changes related to sports and overall culture and science of physical activity as well. The changes have been initiated in the belief that they will be expedient for the development of sports and society in Serbia. The documents include the facts about the aspiration of the then-leaders towards a consolidated model of sports, based on its broad autonomy. The changes have been planned to occur with the logistic and financial assistance of the actors outside the sports system, including the state (central government and local self-government units). In the restricted conditions of the socio-economic development of Serbia and the Serbian political system, the changes have also occurred with the participation of the state, whereby its support (2006-2007), and partnership (2008-2010) were registered, and since 2011, the political, and then legal (legislative) \"consolidation\" of the national sports in favour of the state - politics has been established. Everything that has been done in the sports system in Serbia since May 2006 can be assessed and evaluated in relation to various criteria, and primarily in relation to the results achieved by athletes, but also in relation to: the organization of major single-sport and multi-sport competitions; the development of individual areas relevant for the affirmation and humanization of national sports (sports medicine and protection of athletes, anti-doping, Paralympic sports, women's participation in sport...); allocation for sports; citizens' participation in physical activity and mass sports... but also according to the criterion of the sports system management and consolidation and the impacts of the state and politics on sports. In regard to the latter criterion, this paper examined its development and epilogue to the NSS. The conclusion is that the sports system continues to search for its value, organizational, program and managerial identity, and that the changes in the Serbian sports system have \"abandoned\" the prudent and innovative beginning leading to the exhausting and unpromising state interventionism of an unknown outcome!","PeriodicalId":30424,"journal":{"name":"Fizicka Kultura","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fizicka Kultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/FIZKUL1901003J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this paper were the changes in the National Sports System (NSS) lasting since the Republic of Serbia gained its full state independence (in May 2006) until present. National sports organizations have initiated those changes related to sports and overall culture and science of physical activity as well. The changes have been initiated in the belief that they will be expedient for the development of sports and society in Serbia. The documents include the facts about the aspiration of the then-leaders towards a consolidated model of sports, based on its broad autonomy. The changes have been planned to occur with the logistic and financial assistance of the actors outside the sports system, including the state (central government and local self-government units). In the restricted conditions of the socio-economic development of Serbia and the Serbian political system, the changes have also occurred with the participation of the state, whereby its support (2006-2007), and partnership (2008-2010) were registered, and since 2011, the political, and then legal (legislative) "consolidation" of the national sports in favour of the state - politics has been established. Everything that has been done in the sports system in Serbia since May 2006 can be assessed and evaluated in relation to various criteria, and primarily in relation to the results achieved by athletes, but also in relation to: the organization of major single-sport and multi-sport competitions; the development of individual areas relevant for the affirmation and humanization of national sports (sports medicine and protection of athletes, anti-doping, Paralympic sports, women's participation in sport...); allocation for sports; citizens' participation in physical activity and mass sports... but also according to the criterion of the sports system management and consolidation and the impacts of the state and politics on sports. In regard to the latter criterion, this paper examined its development and epilogue to the NSS. The conclusion is that the sports system continues to search for its value, organizational, program and managerial identity, and that the changes in the Serbian sports system have "abandoned" the prudent and innovative beginning leading to the exhausting and unpromising state interventionism of an unknown outcome!
塞尔维亚共和国独立国家的体育体制:从审慎的开始到穷尽的国家干预
本文的主题是自塞尔维亚共和国获得完全国家独立(2006年5月)至今,国家体育系统(NSS)的变化。国家体育组织也发起了与体育和整体体育活动文化科学有关的变革。之所以开始进行这些改革,是因为相信它们将有利于塞尔维亚体育和社会的发展。这些文件包括了当时的领导人希望在广泛自治的基础上建立一个统一的体育模式的事实。这些变化计划在体育系统之外的参与者,包括国家(中央政府和地方自治单位)的后勤和财政援助下进行。在塞尔维亚社会经济发展和塞尔维亚政治制度的有限条件下,国家的参与也发生了变化,国家的支持(2006-2007年)和伙伴关系(2008-2010年)得到了登记,自2011年以来,政治和法律(立法)的关系得到了发展。民族体育有利于国家政治的“巩固”已经确立。自2006年5月以来,塞尔维亚体育系统所做的一切都可以根据各种标准进行评估和评价,主要是与运动员取得的成绩有关,但也与以下方面有关:主要单项和多项运动比赛的组织;发展与国家体育的肯定和人性化相关的个别领域(运动医学和保护运动员、反兴奋剂、残奥运动、妇女参加体育运动……);体育拨款;公民参加体育活动和群众性体育活动……同时也根据体育体制管理与巩固的标准以及国家和政治对体育的影响进行分析。关于后一种标准,本文考察了它的发展及其对国家安全标准的后记。结论是,体育系统继续寻找其价值,组织,程序和管理身份,塞尔维亚体育系统的变化已经“放弃”谨慎和创新的开始,导致筋疲力尽和无望的国家干预主义的未知结果!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信