G. Larciprete, Carlotta Montagnoli, M. Frigo, V. Panetta, C. Todde, B. Zuppani, C. Centonze, A. Bompiani, I. Malandrenis, A. Cirese, H. Valensise
{"title":"Carbetocin versus oxytocin in caesarean section with high risk of post-partum haemorrhage.","authors":"G. Larciprete, Carlotta Montagnoli, M. Frigo, V. Panetta, C. Todde, B. Zuppani, C. Centonze, A. Bompiani, I. Malandrenis, A. Cirese, H. Valensise","doi":"10.11138/JPM/2013.7.1.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES the aims of the present study were to compare the haemodynamic effects of oxytocin and carbetocin and to assess the efficacy of these two drugs in terms of blood loss and the additional uterotonic needed in caesarean section at high risk of primary post-partum haemorrhage. METHODS women in the carbetocin group (group A) received a bolus of 100 μg IV; women in the control group (group B) received 20 IU of oxytocin in 1000 ml of 0,9% Na-Cl solution IV (150 mL/hour). The main parameter evaluated was the haemodynamic effects of drugs and the need for additional uterotonic agents. In addition we compared the drop in haemoglobin level, the uterine tone, the uterine fundal state and the diuresis. RESULTS regarding the haemodynamic effects, both drugs have a hypotensive effect, but we found a greater reduction in blood pressure within the oxytocin group. Significantly more women needed additional uterotonic agents in the oxytocin group (23,5% vs 0%, p<0.01), though there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss and in the drop haemoglobin level (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in the diuresis, higher in carbetocin group (1300 ml ± 450 ml vs 1100 ml ± 250 ml, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS a single injection of carbetocin appears to be more effective than a continuous infusion of oxytocin to prevent the PPH, with a similar haemodynamic profile and minor antidiuretic effect.","PeriodicalId":89592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prenatal medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"12-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prenatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/JPM/2013.7.1.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58
Abstract
OBJECTIVES the aims of the present study were to compare the haemodynamic effects of oxytocin and carbetocin and to assess the efficacy of these two drugs in terms of blood loss and the additional uterotonic needed in caesarean section at high risk of primary post-partum haemorrhage. METHODS women in the carbetocin group (group A) received a bolus of 100 μg IV; women in the control group (group B) received 20 IU of oxytocin in 1000 ml of 0,9% Na-Cl solution IV (150 mL/hour). The main parameter evaluated was the haemodynamic effects of drugs and the need for additional uterotonic agents. In addition we compared the drop in haemoglobin level, the uterine tone, the uterine fundal state and the diuresis. RESULTS regarding the haemodynamic effects, both drugs have a hypotensive effect, but we found a greater reduction in blood pressure within the oxytocin group. Significantly more women needed additional uterotonic agents in the oxytocin group (23,5% vs 0%, p<0.01), though there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss and in the drop haemoglobin level (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in the diuresis, higher in carbetocin group (1300 ml ± 450 ml vs 1100 ml ± 250 ml, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS a single injection of carbetocin appears to be more effective than a continuous infusion of oxytocin to prevent the PPH, with a similar haemodynamic profile and minor antidiuretic effect.
目的本研究的目的是比较催产素和催产素对血流动力学的影响,并评估这两种药物在原发性产后出血高危剖宫产术中出血量和额外子宫张力方面的疗效。方法卡霉素组(A组)给予100 μg静脉滴注;对照组(B组)妇女给予20 IU的催产素,加入1000 ml的0.9%钠氯溶液IV (150 ml /小时)。评估的主要参数是药物的血流动力学影响和需要额外的子宫扩张药物。此外,我们比较了血红蛋白水平下降,子宫张力,子宫底状态和利尿。结果在血流动力学方面,两种药物都有降压作用,但我们发现催产素组血压下降幅度更大。在催产素组,更多的妇女需要额外的子宫扩张药物(23.5% vs 0%, p0.05)。利尿量差异有统计学意义,卡霉素组利尿量较高(1300 ml±450 ml vs 1100 ml±250 ml, p=0.01)。结论单次注射催产素比连续注射催产素预防PPH更有效,其血流动力学特征相似,抗利尿作用较小。