A Tale of Two Diseases: Mental Illness and HIV/AIDS.

L. Gostin
{"title":"A Tale of Two Diseases: Mental Illness and HIV/AIDS.","authors":"L. Gostin","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been dramatic advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. Whereas HIV was once a dire diagnosis, today it is treatable, and individuals who receive early and consistent treatment can expect to live a normal lifespan. Why has the scientific community made the same strides with mental illness? When I was the Legal Director of the National Association of Mental Health in the United Kingdom in the 1980s, major mental illnesses were primarily treated with powerful antipsychotics, such as haloperidol, that carried the debilitating side effects of tardive dyskinesia -- involuntary movements of the tongue, lips, face, trunk, and extremities. When I first saw mental patients shuffling, tongues protruding, and physically shaking, I thought they exhibited symptoms of mental illness, but soon realized it was the treatment itself. Newer second-generation medicines cause metabolic syndrome, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. In other words, the therapeutic science of mental health has not come nearly far enough.Another indicator of the lamentable failure to meet the needs of persons with mental disabilities is the large number of vulnerable individuals warehoused in large, inhumane institutions, often for decades. While the de-institutionalization movement (a strained alliance between civil libertarians and fiscal conservatives) tore down sterile hospitals, today many individuals with mental illness are in prisons, nursing homes, or are homeless. Inadequacies of science and failures in policy might be overlooked if mental illness were not so prevalent, with enormous individual, family, community, and economic costs.Mental illness accounts for about 13% of healthcare costs globally, but only 3% of healthcare funding; many countries have no dedicated mental health budget. Despite a higher death rate, mental illnesses receive a fraction of the charitable donations made to combat cancer or HIV/AIDS. Moreover, the trained mental health workforce is pitifully small given the need. Mental health professionals account for just 1% of the global health workforce. HIV/AIDS and mental illness have common features. Both are complex intractable diseases affecting marginalized communities throughout the lifespan and both are shrouded in stigma and discrimination. Certainly the human suffering and social alienation caused by HIV/AIDS remains an urgent global threat. Yet, AIDS has changed the world. How did all these technological advances come about, and why did a particular disease, AIDS, forge a pathway toward unprecedented scientific discoveries while mental illness remains largely ignored? So much scientific progress has been made since AIDS first emerged. But today, persons with serious mental illnesses -- particularly in lower socioeconomic classes -- are no better off than they would have been if they were born decades ago. Their treatment, if they have access to any treatment, will be nearly as debilitating as the disease. They are likely to be in a prison or nursing homes, or just as problematic, living on the streets. Sadly, in 2015, the mentally ill remain the most stigmatized and isolated among us. How is that for scientific and social progress?","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"133 1","pages":"687-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There have been dramatic advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. Whereas HIV was once a dire diagnosis, today it is treatable, and individuals who receive early and consistent treatment can expect to live a normal lifespan. Why has the scientific community made the same strides with mental illness? When I was the Legal Director of the National Association of Mental Health in the United Kingdom in the 1980s, major mental illnesses were primarily treated with powerful antipsychotics, such as haloperidol, that carried the debilitating side effects of tardive dyskinesia -- involuntary movements of the tongue, lips, face, trunk, and extremities. When I first saw mental patients shuffling, tongues protruding, and physically shaking, I thought they exhibited symptoms of mental illness, but soon realized it was the treatment itself. Newer second-generation medicines cause metabolic syndrome, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. In other words, the therapeutic science of mental health has not come nearly far enough.Another indicator of the lamentable failure to meet the needs of persons with mental disabilities is the large number of vulnerable individuals warehoused in large, inhumane institutions, often for decades. While the de-institutionalization movement (a strained alliance between civil libertarians and fiscal conservatives) tore down sterile hospitals, today many individuals with mental illness are in prisons, nursing homes, or are homeless. Inadequacies of science and failures in policy might be overlooked if mental illness were not so prevalent, with enormous individual, family, community, and economic costs.Mental illness accounts for about 13% of healthcare costs globally, but only 3% of healthcare funding; many countries have no dedicated mental health budget. Despite a higher death rate, mental illnesses receive a fraction of the charitable donations made to combat cancer or HIV/AIDS. Moreover, the trained mental health workforce is pitifully small given the need. Mental health professionals account for just 1% of the global health workforce. HIV/AIDS and mental illness have common features. Both are complex intractable diseases affecting marginalized communities throughout the lifespan and both are shrouded in stigma and discrimination. Certainly the human suffering and social alienation caused by HIV/AIDS remains an urgent global threat. Yet, AIDS has changed the world. How did all these technological advances come about, and why did a particular disease, AIDS, forge a pathway toward unprecedented scientific discoveries while mental illness remains largely ignored? So much scientific progress has been made since AIDS first emerged. But today, persons with serious mental illnesses -- particularly in lower socioeconomic classes -- are no better off than they would have been if they were born decades ago. Their treatment, if they have access to any treatment, will be nearly as debilitating as the disease. They are likely to be in a prison or nursing homes, or just as problematic, living on the streets. Sadly, in 2015, the mentally ill remain the most stigmatized and isolated among us. How is that for scientific and social progress?
《两种疾病的故事:精神疾病和艾滋病》。
在治疗艾滋病毒/艾滋病方面取得了巨大进展。艾滋病毒曾经是一种可怕的诊断,而今天它是可以治疗的,接受早期和持续治疗的人可以期望过上正常的生活。为什么科学界在精神疾病方面也取得了同样的进步?当我在20世纪80年代担任英国全国精神卫生协会的法律主任时,主要的精神疾病主要是用强效抗精神病药物治疗,比如氟哌啶醇,这种药物会带来迟发性运动障碍的副作用——舌头、嘴唇、面部、躯干和四肢的不自主运动。当我第一次看到精神病人拖着脚,舌头突出,身体颤抖时,我以为他们表现出了精神疾病的症状,但很快意识到这是治疗本身的问题。更新的第二代药物会引起代谢综合征、肥胖和心血管疾病。换句话说,心理健康的治疗科学还远远不够。令人遗憾的是,未能满足精神残疾者的需要的另一个指标是,大量易受伤害的个人被关在大型、不人道的机构中,往往长达数十年。虽然去机构化运动(公民自由主义者和财政保守派之间的紧张联盟)摧毁了无菌医院,但今天许多精神疾病患者在监狱、养老院或无家可归。如果精神疾病不是如此普遍,给个人、家庭、社区和经济造成巨大损失,科学上的不足和政策上的失败可能会被忽视。精神疾病约占全球医疗保健费用的13%,但仅占医疗保健资金的3%;许多国家没有专门的精神卫生预算。尽管死亡率较高,但精神疾病只得到用于防治癌症或艾滋病毒/艾滋病的慈善捐款的一小部分。此外,考虑到需求,训练有素的精神卫生工作人员少得可怜。精神卫生专业人员仅占全球卫生人力的1%。艾滋病毒/艾滋病和精神疾病有共同的特点。这两种疾病都是复杂的难治性疾病,影响着边缘化社区的整个生命周期,而且都笼罩在耻辱和歧视之中。当然,艾滋病毒/艾滋病造成的人类苦难和社会异化仍然是一个紧迫的全球威胁。然而,艾滋病已经改变了世界。所有这些技术进步是如何产生的?为什么一种特殊的疾病,艾滋病,开辟了一条通往前所未有的科学发现的道路,而精神疾病却在很大程度上被忽视?自从艾滋病首次出现以来,已经取得了如此多的科学进步。但今天,患有严重精神疾病的人——尤其是社会经济地位较低的人——并不比他们几十年前出生的人生活得更好。他们的治疗,如果他们有机会获得任何治疗,将几乎和疾病一样使人衰弱。他们很可能在监狱或养老院,或者同样有问题,住在街上。可悲的是,在2015年,精神疾病患者仍然是我们当中最受歧视和孤立的群体。这对科学和社会进步有什么影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信