To compare the efficacy of timolol maleate 0.5% vs fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in control of raised intra ocular pressure in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy.

I. Ullah, M. Israr, J. Khan, Mushtaq Khatak
{"title":"To compare the efficacy of timolol maleate 0.5% vs fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in control of raised intra ocular pressure in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy.","authors":"I. Ullah, M. Israr, J. Khan, Mushtaq Khatak","doi":"10.47672/ajhmn.933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Timolol maleate alone vs fixed combination of Timolol maleate 0.5% with Brimonidine 0.2% in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy. \nMethodology:  100 patients with posterior capsular opacification were enrolled though OPD. They were placed in 2 groups with 50 patients each.  Group A received Timolol maleate 0.5% alone while group B received combination of timolol maleate with Brimonidine tartrate. \nResults: In group A 3 patients developed acute raise of intraocular pressure despite of  Timolol maleate use while goup B patients who received combination of Timolo maleate and Brimonidine had controlled intraocular pressure. \nConclusion: Fixed combination of Timolo maleate 0.5% and Bremonidine tartrate 0.2 % is more effective in controlling of IOP raise in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification then Timolo maleate0.5% alone.","PeriodicalId":7672,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Timolol maleate alone vs fixed combination of Timolol maleate 0.5% with Brimonidine 0.2% in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy. Methodology:  100 patients with posterior capsular opacification were enrolled though OPD. They were placed in 2 groups with 50 patients each.  Group A received Timolol maleate 0.5% alone while group B received combination of timolol maleate with Brimonidine tartrate. Results: In group A 3 patients developed acute raise of intraocular pressure despite of  Timolol maleate use while goup B patients who received combination of Timolo maleate and Brimonidine had controlled intraocular pressure. Conclusion: Fixed combination of Timolo maleate 0.5% and Bremonidine tartrate 0.2 % is more effective in controlling of IOP raise in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification then Timolo maleate0.5% alone.
目的比较0.5%马来酸替洛尔与0.5%马来酸替洛尔+ 0.2%酒石酸溴硝定固定联合治疗Nd-Yag激光囊膜切除术患者眼压升高的疗效。
目的:比较单用马来酸替洛尔与0.5%马来酸替洛尔与0.2%溴莫尼定固定联合治疗Nd-Yag激光包膜切开术患者的疗效。方法:采用OPD方法对100例后囊膜混浊患者进行研究。随机分为两组,每组50例。A组单独给予0.5%马来酸替莫洛尔,B组给予马来酸替莫洛尔与酒石酸溴硝定联合用药。结果:A组3例患者在使用马替莫洛尔后出现急性眼压升高,而B组患者在联合使用马替莫洛尔和溴莫尼定后眼压得到控制。结论:0.5%马来酸替莫罗联合0.2%酒石酸布雷莫尼定固定联合治疗Nd-Yag激光后囊膜切除术患者IOP升高的效果优于单独应用0.5%马来酸替莫罗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信