Android permissions: a perspective combining risks and benefits

B. Sarma, Ninghui Li, Christopher S. Gates, Rahul Potharaju, C. Nita-Rotaru, Ian Molloy
{"title":"Android permissions: a perspective combining risks and benefits","authors":"B. Sarma, Ninghui Li, Christopher S. Gates, Rahul Potharaju, C. Nita-Rotaru, Ian Molloy","doi":"10.1145/2295136.2295141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenal growth of the Android platform in the past few years has made it a lucrative target of malicious application (app) developers. There are numerous instances of malware apps that send premium rate SMS messages, track users' private data, or apps that, even if not characterized as malware, conduct questionable actions affecting the user's privacy or costing them money. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using both the permissions an app requests, the category of the app, and what permissions are requested by other apps in the same category to better inform users whether the risks of installing an app is commensurate with its expected benefit. Existing approaches consider only the risks of the permissions requested by an app and ignore both the benefits and what permissions are requested by other apps, thus having a limited effect. We propose several risk signals that and evaluate them using two datasets, one consists of 158,062 Android apps from the Android Market, and another consists of 121 malicious apps. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal through extensive data analysis.","PeriodicalId":74509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","volume":"57 1","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"339","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM symposium on access control models and technologies. ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2295136.2295141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 339

Abstract

The phenomenal growth of the Android platform in the past few years has made it a lucrative target of malicious application (app) developers. There are numerous instances of malware apps that send premium rate SMS messages, track users' private data, or apps that, even if not characterized as malware, conduct questionable actions affecting the user's privacy or costing them money. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using both the permissions an app requests, the category of the app, and what permissions are requested by other apps in the same category to better inform users whether the risks of installing an app is commensurate with its expected benefit. Existing approaches consider only the risks of the permissions requested by an app and ignore both the benefits and what permissions are requested by other apps, thus having a limited effect. We propose several risk signals that and evaluate them using two datasets, one consists of 158,062 Android apps from the Android Market, and another consists of 121 malicious apps. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal through extensive data analysis.
Android权限:风险与收益相结合的视角
Android平台在过去几年的惊人增长使其成为恶意应用程序(app)开发者的一个有利可图的目标。有许多恶意软件应用程序发送收费短信,跟踪用户的私人数据,或者应用程序,即使不被定性为恶意软件,也会执行影响用户隐私或花费用户金钱的可疑行为。在本文中,我们研究了同时使用应用程序请求的权限、应用程序的类别以及同一类别中的其他应用程序请求的权限的可行性,以更好地告知用户安装应用程序的风险是否与其预期收益相称。现有的方法只考虑应用程序请求权限的风险,而忽略了好处和其他应用程序请求的权限,因此效果有限。我们提出了几个风险信号,并使用两个数据集进行评估,一个由来自Android Market的158,062个Android应用程序组成,另一个由121个恶意应用程序组成。我们通过大量的数据分析来证明我们建议的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信