Physiologically based pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A: reevaluation of dose-nonlinear kinetics in rats.

C Tanaka, R Kawai, M Rowland
{"title":"Physiologically based pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A: reevaluation of dose-nonlinear kinetics in rats.","authors":"C Tanaka, R Kawai, M Rowland","doi":"10.1023/a:1020978509566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The disposition kinetics of Cyclosporine A (CyA) in rat, based on measurement in arterial blood, appeared dose-linear over a wide i.v. dose range (1.2-30 mg/kg). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) analysis, however, demonstrated that this was an apparent observation resulting from counterbalancing nonlinear factors, such as saturable blood and tissue distribution, as well as clearance (CLb). A PBPK model was successfully developed taking into account these multiple nonlinear factors. Tissue distribution was distinctly different among various organs, being best described by either a linear model (muscle, fat; Model 1), one involving instantaneous saturation (lung, heart, bone, skin, thymus; Model 2), noninstantaneous saturation (kidney, spleen, liver, gut; Model 3), or one with saturable efflux (brain; Model 4). Overall, the whole body volume of distribution at steady state for unbound CyA (Vuss) decreased with increasing dose, due at least in part to saturation of tissue-cellular cyclophilin binding. Clearance, essentially hepatic, and described by the well-stirred model, was also adequately characterized by Michaelis-Menten kinetics, Km 0.60 microgram/ml. In model-based simulations, both volume of distribution at steady state (Vss,b) and CLb varied in a similar manner with dose, such that terminal t1/2 remained apparently unchanged; these dose responses were attenuated by saturable blood binding. CyA concentration measured in arterial blood was not always directly proportional to the true exposure, i.e., unbound or target tissue concentrations. The PBPK model not only described comprehensively such complicated PK relationships but also permitted assessment of the sensitivity of individual parameters to variation in local nonlinear kinetics. Using this approach, dose-dependent CyA uptake into brain was shown to be sensitive to both active and passive transport processes, and not merely the affinity of the active (efflux) transporter at the level of the blood-brain barrier.</p>","PeriodicalId":16765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics","volume":"16 1","pages":"597-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020978509566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disposition kinetics of Cyclosporine A (CyA) in rat, based on measurement in arterial blood, appeared dose-linear over a wide i.v. dose range (1.2-30 mg/kg). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) analysis, however, demonstrated that this was an apparent observation resulting from counterbalancing nonlinear factors, such as saturable blood and tissue distribution, as well as clearance (CLb). A PBPK model was successfully developed taking into account these multiple nonlinear factors. Tissue distribution was distinctly different among various organs, being best described by either a linear model (muscle, fat; Model 1), one involving instantaneous saturation (lung, heart, bone, skin, thymus; Model 2), noninstantaneous saturation (kidney, spleen, liver, gut; Model 3), or one with saturable efflux (brain; Model 4). Overall, the whole body volume of distribution at steady state for unbound CyA (Vuss) decreased with increasing dose, due at least in part to saturation of tissue-cellular cyclophilin binding. Clearance, essentially hepatic, and described by the well-stirred model, was also adequately characterized by Michaelis-Menten kinetics, Km 0.60 microgram/ml. In model-based simulations, both volume of distribution at steady state (Vss,b) and CLb varied in a similar manner with dose, such that terminal t1/2 remained apparently unchanged; these dose responses were attenuated by saturable blood binding. CyA concentration measured in arterial blood was not always directly proportional to the true exposure, i.e., unbound or target tissue concentrations. The PBPK model not only described comprehensively such complicated PK relationships but also permitted assessment of the sensitivity of individual parameters to variation in local nonlinear kinetics. Using this approach, dose-dependent CyA uptake into brain was shown to be sensitive to both active and passive transport processes, and not merely the affinity of the active (efflux) transporter at the level of the blood-brain barrier.

环孢素A基于生理的药代动力学:大鼠剂量非线性动力学的再评价。
环孢素A (CyA)在大鼠动脉血液中的处置动力学,在较宽的静脉注射剂量范围内(1.2 ~ 30 mg/kg)呈剂量线性。然而,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)分析表明,这是一个明显的观察结果,由平衡非线性因素引起,如饱和血液和组织分布,以及清除(CLb)。成功地建立了考虑这些非线性因素的PBPK模型。不同器官的组织分布明显不同,最好用线性模型(肌肉、脂肪,模型1)、瞬时饱和模型(肺、心、骨、皮肤、胸腺,模型2)、非瞬时饱和模型(肾、脾、肝、肠,模型3)或可饱和外排模型(脑,模型4)来描述。总体而言,未结合的CyA (Vuss)在稳定状态下的全身分布体积随着剂量的增加而减少,至少部分原因是组织-细胞亲环蛋白结合的饱和。清除,主要是肝脏,并通过充分搅拌模型描述,也充分表征了Michaelis-Menten动力学,Km 0.60微克/毫升。在基于模型的模拟中,稳态分布体积(Vss,b)和CLb随剂量的变化方式相似,终端t1/2保持明显不变;这些剂量反应通过饱和血结合而减弱。动脉血中CyA浓度的测量并不总是与真实暴露成正比,即未结合或靶组织浓度。PBPK模型不仅全面地描述了这种复杂的PK关系,而且还允许评估单个参数对局部非线性动力学变化的敏感性。使用这种方法,剂量依赖性CyA进入大脑被证明对主动和被动运输过程都很敏感,而不仅仅是在血脑屏障水平上的主动(外排)转运体的亲和力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书