A Systematic Review of Key Factors of Effective Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems

IF 2.2 3区社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Society & Natural Resources Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1080/08941920.2023.2228234

Candice Carr Kelman, Ute Brady, Bonnie Aireona Raschke, Michael L. Schoon

{"title":"A Systematic Review of Key Factors of Effective Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems","authors":"Candice Carr Kelman, Ute Brady, Bonnie Aireona Raschke, Michael L. Schoon","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2228234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sustainable resource management requires governance systems that facilitate effective collaboration among a variety of stakeholder interests, across jurisdictional scales and resource sectors. Yet, there is not widespread scholarly agreement on the key ingredients that need to be present to facilitate the effective collaborative governance of natural resources. To address this scholarly gap, we conducted a systematic literature review which revealed 17 publications that compiled essential lists of key factors for effective collaboration. From these studies across multiple disciplines, we identified 22 common factors associated with effective collaborative natural resource management, including near unanimous acceptance of the importance of nested governance structures and conflict resolution mechanisms. These 22 factors, along with additional contextual and outcome-oriented factors, could begin to form a core set of factors to comparatively test large numbers of case studies on collaborative governance of social-ecological systems around the world.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"5 1","pages":"1452 - 1470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2228234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable resource management requires governance systems that facilitate effective collaboration among a variety of stakeholder interests, across jurisdictional scales and resource sectors. Yet, there is not widespread scholarly agreement on the key ingredients that need to be present to facilitate the effective collaborative governance of natural resources. To address this scholarly gap, we conducted a systematic literature review which revealed 17 publications that compiled essential lists of key factors for effective collaboration. From these studies across multiple disciplines, we identified 22 common factors associated with effective collaborative natural resource management, including near unanimous acceptance of the importance of nested governance structures and conflict resolution mechanisms. These 22 factors, along with additional contextual and outcome-oriented factors, could begin to form a core set of factors to comparatively test large numbers of case studies on collaborative governance of social-ecological systems around the world.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社会生态系统有效协同治理关键因素的系统回顾

可持续资源管理需要治理系统，促进各种利益相关者之间的有效合作，跨越管辖规模和资源部门。然而，对于促进有效的自然资源协作治理所需要具备的关键要素，学术界尚未达成广泛共识。为了解决这一学术差距，我们进行了系统的文献综述，其中显示了17份出版物，这些出版物编制了有效合作的关键因素的基本列表。从这些跨多个学科的研究中，我们确定了与有效的协作自然资源管理相关的22个共同因素，包括对嵌套治理结构和冲突解决机制的重要性的几乎一致接受。这22个因素，加上其他背景因素和结果导向因素，可以开始形成一组核心因素，以比较检验世界各地关于社会生态系统协同治理的大量案例研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Society & Natural Resources Multiple-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management