Hyaluronic acid for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. A systematic review.

Manuel Rodríguez-Aranda, Iris Iborra-Badia, Francisco Alpiste-Illueca, Andrés López-Roldán
{"title":"Hyaluronic acid for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. A systematic review.","authors":"Manuel Rodríguez-Aranda,&nbsp;Iris Iborra-Badia,&nbsp;Francisco Alpiste-Illueca,&nbsp;Andrés López-Roldán","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of hyaluronic acid (HA) application alone and in combination with other therapies for the surgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement based on the proposed focused question. A literature review with no restrictions regarding the status or language of publication was performed until June 2022. Randomised clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, case series, and case reports were considered eligible for inclusion. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodology of the included studies. The use of HA was divided into four categories depending on whether it was a) applied alone, b) in combination with barriers, c) in combination with growth factors, or d) in combination with bone grafts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine studies were included in the analysis. Some of the studies presented variable heterogeneity and a high risk of bias. Every group resulted in a statistically significant improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing pocket depth after 6–12 months of follow-up. Three studies showed significant results for bone defect filling on using HA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The application of HA can provide moderate and beneficial clinical and radiographic results for the surgical treatment of periodontal regeneration. The heterogeneity and high risk of bias of the included studies reveal the need to perform randomised clinical trials with an appropriate methodological design to evaluate the effect of HA in periodontal regeneration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000220/pdfft?md5=6e401ca588a817297b3a8d45f42b7b76&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559622000220-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of hyaluronic acid (HA) application alone and in combination with other therapies for the surgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.

Material and methods

This review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement based on the proposed focused question. A literature review with no restrictions regarding the status or language of publication was performed until June 2022. Randomised clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, case series, and case reports were considered eligible for inclusion. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodology of the included studies. The use of HA was divided into four categories depending on whether it was a) applied alone, b) in combination with barriers, c) in combination with growth factors, or d) in combination with bone grafts.

Results

Nine studies were included in the analysis. Some of the studies presented variable heterogeneity and a high risk of bias. Every group resulted in a statistically significant improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing pocket depth after 6–12 months of follow-up. Three studies showed significant results for bone defect filling on using HA.

Conclusion

The application of HA can provide moderate and beneficial clinical and radiographic results for the surgical treatment of periodontal regeneration. The heterogeneity and high risk of bias of the included studies reveal the need to perform randomised clinical trials with an appropriate methodological design to evaluate the effect of HA in periodontal regeneration.

透明质酸在骨内缺损牙周组织再生中的应用。系统回顾。
目的评价透明质酸(HA)单用及联合其他治疗方法治疗牙周骨内缺损的临床及影像学效果。材料和方法本综述是根据提出的重点问题按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)声明设计的。在2022年6月之前进行了一项文献综述,没有对出版物状态或语言的限制。随机临床试验、对照临床试验、病例系列和病例报告被认为符合纳入条件。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的方法学。透明质酸的使用根据a)单独应用,b)与屏障联合应用,c)与生长因子联合应用,或d)与骨移植物联合应用分为四类。结果9项研究纳入分析。一些研究呈现可变异质性和高偏倚风险。随访6-12个月后,各组临床附着水平(CAL)和探查袋深度均有统计学意义的改善。三项研究表明,羟基磷灰石对骨缺损的修复效果显著。结论羟基磷灰石的应用可为牙周再生手术治疗提供适度、有益的临床和影像学结果。纳入研究的异质性和高偏倚风险表明,需要进行随机临床试验,采用适当的方法学设计来评估透明质酸在牙周再生中的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信