Models to evaluate service Provisioning over Cloud Computing Environments - A Blockchain-As-A-Service case study

Carlos Melo, J. Dantas, Ronierison Maciel, P. Silva, P. Maciel
{"title":"Models to evaluate service Provisioning over Cloud Computing Environments - A Blockchain-As-A-Service case study","authors":"Carlos Melo, J. Dantas, Ronierison Maciel, P. Silva, P. Maciel","doi":"10.22456/2175-2745.91814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ThestrictnessoftheServiceLevelAgreements(SLAs)ismainlyduetoasetofconstraintsrelated to performance and dependability attributes, such as availability. This paper shows that system’s availability values may be improved by deploying services over a private environment, which may obtain better availability values with improved management, security, and control. However, how much a company needs to afford to keep this improved availability? As an additional activity, this paper compares the obtained availability values with the infrastructure deployment expenses and establishes a cost  ×  benefit relationship. As for the system’s evaluation technique, we choose modeling; while for the service used to demonstrate the models’ feasibility, the blockchain-as-a-service was the selected one. This paper proposes and evaluate four different infrastructures hosting blockchains: (i) baseline; (ii) double redundant; (iii) triple redundant, and (iv) hyper-converged. The obtained results pointed out that the hyper-converged architecture had an advantage over a full triple redundant environment regarding availability and deployment cost.","PeriodicalId":82472,"journal":{"name":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.91814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ThestrictnessoftheServiceLevelAgreements(SLAs)ismainlyduetoasetofconstraintsrelated to performance and dependability attributes, such as availability. This paper shows that system’s availability values may be improved by deploying services over a private environment, which may obtain better availability values with improved management, security, and control. However, how much a company needs to afford to keep this improved availability? As an additional activity, this paper compares the obtained availability values with the infrastructure deployment expenses and establishes a cost  ×  benefit relationship. As for the system’s evaluation technique, we choose modeling; while for the service used to demonstrate the models’ feasibility, the blockchain-as-a-service was the selected one. This paper proposes and evaluate four different infrastructures hosting blockchains: (i) baseline; (ii) double redundant; (iii) triple redundant, and (iv) hyper-converged. The obtained results pointed out that the hyper-converged architecture had an advantage over a full triple redundant environment regarding availability and deployment cost.
评估云计算环境下服务供应的模型——区块链即服务案例研究
服务级别协议(sla)的严格性主要是由于与性能和可靠性属性(如可用性)相关的约束的限制。本文表明,通过在私有环境上部署服务,可以提高系统的可用性值,通过改进管理、安全性和控制,可以获得更好的可用性值。然而,为了保持这种改进的可用性,公司需要支付多少费用?作为一项附加活动,本文将获得的可用性值与基础设施部署费用进行比较,并建立成本×效益关系。对于系统的评价技术,我们选择建模;而对于用于演示模型可行性的服务,则选择了区块链即服务。本文提出并评估了托管区块链的四种不同基础设施:(i)基线;(ii)双重冗余;(iii)三冗余和(iv)超融合。获得的结果指出,在可用性和部署成本方面,超融合架构比完全三冗余环境具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信