Vegetable oils for biofuels versus surfactants: an ecological comparison for energy and greenhouse gases

M. Patel, G. Reinhardt, Guido Zemanek
{"title":"Vegetable oils for biofuels versus surfactants: an ecological comparison for energy and greenhouse gases","authors":"M. Patel, G. Reinhardt, Guido Zemanek","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<314::AID-LIPI314>3.0.CO;2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the use of vegetable oils as energy carriers on the one hand and for the production of chemicals on the other hand. The bio-based energy carriers analyzed are rapeseed oil, rapeseed oil methyl ester, and palm oil methyl ester, all of which can be used as substitutes for diesel fuel. The chemicals studied are surfactants. Surfactants can be produced from plant-based feedstocks (oleochemical surfactants) and from petrochemicals. The various options are studied with regard to two ecological indicators, i.e. the consumption of finite energy resources and the global warming potential. First of all, for these two aspects plant-based sources show clear advantages when compared with their fossil counterparts. Secondly, the transesterified types of biofuels are more advantageous than pure vegetable oils. Thirdly, the conservation of finite energy and reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases are higher if vegetable oils are used as a feedstock to produce oleochemical surfactants compared to their use as biofuels. Comprehensive life-cycle analyses must be carried out in order to determine whether these results can also be applied to other ecological indicators. The results presented in this paper support developing strategic goals for bio-based feedstocks, including quantity and cost targets.","PeriodicalId":12304,"journal":{"name":"Fett-lipid","volume":"1 1","pages":"314-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fett-lipid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4133(199909)101:9<314::AID-LIPI314>3.0.CO;2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper compares the use of vegetable oils as energy carriers on the one hand and for the production of chemicals on the other hand. The bio-based energy carriers analyzed are rapeseed oil, rapeseed oil methyl ester, and palm oil methyl ester, all of which can be used as substitutes for diesel fuel. The chemicals studied are surfactants. Surfactants can be produced from plant-based feedstocks (oleochemical surfactants) and from petrochemicals. The various options are studied with regard to two ecological indicators, i.e. the consumption of finite energy resources and the global warming potential. First of all, for these two aspects plant-based sources show clear advantages when compared with their fossil counterparts. Secondly, the transesterified types of biofuels are more advantageous than pure vegetable oils. Thirdly, the conservation of finite energy and reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases are higher if vegetable oils are used as a feedstock to produce oleochemical surfactants compared to their use as biofuels. Comprehensive life-cycle analyses must be carried out in order to determine whether these results can also be applied to other ecological indicators. The results presented in this paper support developing strategic goals for bio-based feedstocks, including quantity and cost targets.
用于生物燃料的植物油与表面活性剂:能源和温室气体的生态比较
本文比较了植物油作为能源载体和用于化工产品生产的情况。所分析的生物基能量载体是菜籽油、菜籽油甲酯和棕榈油甲酯,它们都可以作为柴油的替代品。所研究的化学物质是表面活性剂。表面活性剂可以从植物原料(油脂化学表面活性剂)和石油化工产品中生产。根据有限能源消耗和全球变暖潜力这两个生态指标,研究了各种备选方案。首先,在这两个方面,植物源与化石源相比具有明显的优势。其次,酯交换类型的生物燃料比纯植物油更有利。第三,与用作生物燃料相比,将植物油用作生产油化学表面活性剂的原料,对有限能源的保护和温室气体排放的减少更高。必须进行全面的生命周期分析,以确定这些结果是否也可以应用于其他生态指标。本文提出的结果支持制定生物基原料的战略目标,包括数量和成本目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信