Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Petroleum Storage of Sabzevar

Q3 Engineering
H. Bakhshi, S. Alavi, Z. Rezaie, M. Hassani
{"title":"Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Petroleum Storage of Sabzevar","authors":"H. Bakhshi, S. Alavi, Z. Rezaie, M. Hassani","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2021.22439.1479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure of appropriate resource structures for petroleum products located close to residential areas has irreparable financial and fatal consequences. Thus, a seismic hazard analysis in estimating strong ground motions seems essential for constructing or improving such structures. For this purpose, firstly, by using the deterministic method and empirical equations of the largest earthquake likely to occur, the result of active faults activity was determined using attenuation equations via an appropriate logic tree, and the maximum horizontal and vertical acceleration component was calculated based on two types of soil. The first type of soil matches types I and II, and the second type matches III and IV, from standard No.2800. Then, to analyze the potential hazard, we define the seismic sources, seismic parameters, rupture parameters, and the attenuation equations with the same logic tree using SeisRisk III software, plus the maximum vertical and horizontal acceleration component, based on the two identical types of soil. Subsequently, the seismic improvement regulation of structures (360 magazine) for the second level hazard was calculated and finally compared with the results of the deterministic analysis. Results indicated that the acceleration component in the deterministic method presents a higher amount than the probable method. As a result, probable methods can be used instead of a deterministic method proving far more economical.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2021.22439.1479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Failure of appropriate resource structures for petroleum products located close to residential areas has irreparable financial and fatal consequences. Thus, a seismic hazard analysis in estimating strong ground motions seems essential for constructing or improving such structures. For this purpose, firstly, by using the deterministic method and empirical equations of the largest earthquake likely to occur, the result of active faults activity was determined using attenuation equations via an appropriate logic tree, and the maximum horizontal and vertical acceleration component was calculated based on two types of soil. The first type of soil matches types I and II, and the second type matches III and IV, from standard No.2800. Then, to analyze the potential hazard, we define the seismic sources, seismic parameters, rupture parameters, and the attenuation equations with the same logic tree using SeisRisk III software, plus the maximum vertical and horizontal acceleration component, based on the two identical types of soil. Subsequently, the seismic improvement regulation of structures (360 magazine) for the second level hazard was calculated and finally compared with the results of the deterministic analysis. Results indicated that the acceleration component in the deterministic method presents a higher amount than the probable method. As a result, probable methods can be used instead of a deterministic method proving far more economical.
Sabzevar油田储油库的确定性和概率地震危险性分析
居住区附近石油产品的适当资源结构的失败将造成无法弥补的财政和致命后果。因此,在估计强地面运动时进行地震危险性分析对于建造或改进此类结构似乎是必不可少的。为此,首先利用确定性方法和可能发生最大地震的经验方程,通过适当的逻辑树,利用衰减方程确定活动断层活动性的结果,并根据两种土壤类型计算最大水平和垂直加速度分量;第一类土壤与标准号2800匹配I和II,第二类土壤与标准号2800匹配III和IV。然后,基于两种相同类型的土体,利用SeisRisk III软件定义了震源、地震参数、破裂参数和具有相同逻辑树的衰减方程,以及最大垂直和水平加速度分量,进行了潜在危害分析。随后,计算了结构(360 magazine)在二级震害下的抗震改进规律,并与确定性分析结果进行了比较。结果表明,确定性方法的加速度分量比概率方法的加速度分量大。因此,可以使用概率方法来代替确定性方法,证明这种方法要经济得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信