Performance evaluation of machine learning based voting classifier system for human activity recognition

Sonika Jindal, Monika Sachdeva, A. Kushwaha
{"title":"Performance evaluation of machine learning based voting classifier system for human activity recognition","authors":"Sonika Jindal, Monika Sachdeva, A. Kushwaha","doi":"10.48129/kjs.splml.19189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades, Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been a centre of attraction in many research domains, and it is referred to as the potential of interpreting human body gestures through sensors and ascertaining the activity of a human being. The present work has proposed the voting classifier system for human activity recognition. For the voting classifier system, five machine learning classifiers are considered: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). These machine learning classifiers are ensembled by analyzing the best performers among them. The ensemble voting classifiers are proposed under two variations, i.e., hard voting and soft voting. The various combinations of voting classifiers are compared and evaluated. For experiments, the benchmark dataset of the UCI-HAR dataset is considered, and all the data files are combined into a single file to avoid bias. The dimensionality of the dataset is reduced by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) from 561 features to 200 components. The results reveal that Voting Classifier-II (a combination of SVM, KNN, and LR) using soft voting outperformed other machine learning classifiers.","PeriodicalId":49933,"journal":{"name":"Kuwait Journal of Science & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kuwait Journal of Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.splml.19189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last few decades, Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been a centre of attraction in many research domains, and it is referred to as the potential of interpreting human body gestures through sensors and ascertaining the activity of a human being. The present work has proposed the voting classifier system for human activity recognition. For the voting classifier system, five machine learning classifiers are considered: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). These machine learning classifiers are ensembled by analyzing the best performers among them. The ensemble voting classifiers are proposed under two variations, i.e., hard voting and soft voting. The various combinations of voting classifiers are compared and evaluated. For experiments, the benchmark dataset of the UCI-HAR dataset is considered, and all the data files are combined into a single file to avoid bias. The dimensionality of the dataset is reduced by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) from 561 features to 200 components. The results reveal that Voting Classifier-II (a combination of SVM, KNN, and LR) using soft voting outperformed other machine learning classifiers.
基于机器学习的投票分类器系统在人类活动识别中的性能评价
在过去的几十年里,人类活动识别(HAR)已经成为许多研究领域的一个吸引人的中心,它被称为通过传感器解释人体手势和确定人类活动的潜力。本文提出了一种用于人体活动识别的投票分类器系统。对于投票分类器系统,考虑了五种机器学习分类器:逻辑回归(LR), k近邻(KNN),随机森林(RF),朴素贝叶斯(NB)和支持向量机(SVM)。这些机器学习分类器通过分析其中表现最好的分类器来集成。提出了硬投票和软投票两种类型的集成投票分类器。对投票分类器的各种组合进行了比较和评价。在实验中,考虑了UCI-HAR数据集的基准数据集,并将所有数据文件合并为一个文件,以避免偏差。通过主成分分析(PCA)将数据集的维数从561个特征降至200个特征。结果表明,使用软投票的投票分类器- ii(支持向量机,KNN和LR的组合)优于其他机器学习分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kuwait Journal of Science & Engineering
Kuwait Journal of Science & Engineering MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信