Timolol as a migraine acute attack therapy: randomized, OTCs control study

Shimaa Elgamal, H. Egila, I. Kabbash, Hussien El-Ansarey, Mohamed Elshafie, O. ELShafei
{"title":"Timolol as a migraine acute attack therapy: randomized, OTCs control study","authors":"Shimaa Elgamal, H. Egila, I. Kabbash, Hussien El-Ansarey, Mohamed Elshafie, O. ELShafei","doi":"10.58775/2735-3990.1370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Migraine is manifested by recurrent headache attacks, with variable characteristics and associated symptoms. Oral beta-blockers are widely used to prevent and reduce the frequency of these attacks. However, the use of topical beta-blockers for acute treatment is still controversial. Aims: In this randomized double-armed study, we aim to compare the efficacy of timolol 0.5% eye drops compared with other over-the-counter (OTC) medications used for the acute treatment of migraine. Patients and methods: Fifty-seven patients were randomly allocated to group A (treatment group: timolol 0.5% eye drops) and group B (control group: OTC drugs including NSAIDs, caffeine, aspirin, and acetaminophen). The primary outcome was pain reduction. Secondary outcome measures included reducing nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Results: Median pain reduction for the OTC group was higher than for timolol (6, 4 prospectively) with a significant U test (P < 0.001). We found a significant correlation between pain severity and degree of pain reduction (r 1⁄4 0.480, P < 0.001). Twenty-six (89.6%) patients in the control group compared with eight (28.6%) patients in the timolol group reported pain reduction by 5 or more. Both timolol and OTC were effective on headache associations: nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Conclusion: Both timolol and OTC are equally effective in acute migraine attacks. But OTC drugs are still preferred due to their superior abortion effect.","PeriodicalId":18173,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58775/2735-3990.1370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine is manifested by recurrent headache attacks, with variable characteristics and associated symptoms. Oral beta-blockers are widely used to prevent and reduce the frequency of these attacks. However, the use of topical beta-blockers for acute treatment is still controversial. Aims: In this randomized double-armed study, we aim to compare the efficacy of timolol 0.5% eye drops compared with other over-the-counter (OTC) medications used for the acute treatment of migraine. Patients and methods: Fifty-seven patients were randomly allocated to group A (treatment group: timolol 0.5% eye drops) and group B (control group: OTC drugs including NSAIDs, caffeine, aspirin, and acetaminophen). The primary outcome was pain reduction. Secondary outcome measures included reducing nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Results: Median pain reduction for the OTC group was higher than for timolol (6, 4 prospectively) with a significant U test (P < 0.001). We found a significant correlation between pain severity and degree of pain reduction (r 1⁄4 0.480, P < 0.001). Twenty-six (89.6%) patients in the control group compared with eight (28.6%) patients in the timolol group reported pain reduction by 5 or more. Both timolol and OTC were effective on headache associations: nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Conclusion: Both timolol and OTC are equally effective in acute migraine attacks. But OTC drugs are still preferred due to their superior abortion effect.
替马洛尔作为偏头痛急性发作治疗:随机、otc对照研究
背景:偏头痛表现为反复发作的头痛,具有不同的特征和相关症状。口服-受体阻滞剂被广泛用于预防和减少这些发作的频率。然而,局部β受体阻滞剂用于急性治疗仍然存在争议。目的:在这项随机的双臂研究中,我们旨在比较0.5%噻莫洛尔滴眼液与其他非处方(OTC)药物用于急性偏头痛治疗的疗效。患者与方法:将57例患者随机分为A组(治疗组:替莫洛尔0.5%滴眼液)和B组(对照组:非甾体抗炎药、咖啡因、阿司匹林、对乙酰氨基酚等非处方药)。主要结果是疼痛减轻。次要结局指标包括减少恶心、呕吐、畏光和恐音。结果:OTC组的中位疼痛减轻程度高于替莫洛尔组(预期值6,4),U检验显著(P < 0.001)。我们发现疼痛严重程度与疼痛减轻程度之间存在显著相关性(r 1 / 4 0.480, P < 0.001)。对照组26例(89.6%)患者报告疼痛减轻5个或更多,而替莫洛尔组8例(28.6%)患者报告疼痛减轻5个或更多。替马洛尔和OTC对头痛相关:恶心、畏光和恐音均有效。结论:替马洛尔与OTC治疗急性偏头痛疗效相同。但OTC药物因其流产效果较好,仍是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信