Dimensions of compulsive internet use as a function of attachment style

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Michael D. Prazak
{"title":"Dimensions of compulsive internet use as a function of attachment style","authors":"Michael D. Prazak","doi":"10.1080/15456870.2021.1992769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite offering the potential for increased connection, intimacy, and positive outcomes, online social interaction also holds the potential to become problematic and create negative outcomes. The present study sought to address the question of the role of attachment style in affecting online behavior, as well as to better understand the way in which specific dimensions of online interaction may correspond to specific attachment styles. The study explored attachment style, particularly anxious and avoidant attachment, in predicting problematic internet use, online intimate self-disclosure, and positive and negative attitudes toward technology in a sample of young adults aged 18–25. A quantitative approach employing correlations, regressions, and ANOVAs was used. It was found that both anxious and avoidant attachments were positively related to and both predicted problematic internet use. Although neither anxious or avoidant attachment style predicted online intimate disclosure, preoccupied individuals were found to disclose significantly more online than fearful individuals. Both anxiety and avoidance positively related to negative attitudes toward technology, with avoidant attachment style significantly predicting it, while only anxious attachment predicted positive attitudes toward technology.","PeriodicalId":45354,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantic Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1992769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite offering the potential for increased connection, intimacy, and positive outcomes, online social interaction also holds the potential to become problematic and create negative outcomes. The present study sought to address the question of the role of attachment style in affecting online behavior, as well as to better understand the way in which specific dimensions of online interaction may correspond to specific attachment styles. The study explored attachment style, particularly anxious and avoidant attachment, in predicting problematic internet use, online intimate self-disclosure, and positive and negative attitudes toward technology in a sample of young adults aged 18–25. A quantitative approach employing correlations, regressions, and ANOVAs was used. It was found that both anxious and avoidant attachments were positively related to and both predicted problematic internet use. Although neither anxious or avoidant attachment style predicted online intimate disclosure, preoccupied individuals were found to disclose significantly more online than fearful individuals. Both anxiety and avoidance positively related to negative attitudes toward technology, with avoidant attachment style significantly predicting it, while only anxious attachment predicted positive attitudes toward technology.
强迫性网络使用的维度与依恋类型的函数关系
尽管提供了增加联系、亲密和积极结果的潜力,在线社交互动也有可能成为问题和产生负面结果。本研究旨在探讨依恋类型在影响网络行为中的作用,以及更好地理解网络互动的特定维度可能对应于特定依恋类型的方式。该研究以18-25岁的年轻人为样本,探讨了依恋类型,特别是焦虑型和回避型依恋,在预测有问题的互联网使用、在线亲密自我表露以及对技术的积极和消极态度方面的作用。定量方法采用相关性、回归和方差分析。结果发现,焦虑型依恋和回避型依恋都与不良网络使用呈正相关,并且都预测了不良网络使用。尽管焦虑型和回避型依恋类型都不能预测在线亲密信息披露,但研究发现,心事缠身的个体比恐惧型个体在网上披露的亲密信息明显更多。焦虑和回避与消极的技术态度呈正相关,逃避型依恋对消极的技术态度有显著的预测作用,而焦虑型依恋对积极的技术态度有显著的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信