Students and Faculty Perspective of Effective Feedback Analyzed in an Outcome Based Medical Education System of KSA

Nida Gulzar Zeb, Nusrat Zareen, A. Almutairi, S. Malik, Farhat Humayun, Naseer ud din Sheikh, K. Afzal
{"title":"Students and Faculty Perspective of Effective Feedback Analyzed in an Outcome Based Medical Education System of KSA","authors":"Nida Gulzar Zeb, Nusrat Zareen, A. Almutairi, S. Malik, Farhat Humayun, Naseer ud din Sheikh, K. Afzal","doi":"10.58397/ashkmdc.v27i03.508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate and compare the students’ and faculty’s perspectives of feedback & its values in an outcome-based medical education system. \nMethods:  This was a cross-sectional, self-evaluated questionnaire-based observational study con- ducted on the students (group A) and faculty members (group B) of the College of Medicine, Majmaah University by convenience sampling technique. Prior to taking the feedback, consent was taken from the students and faculty members.  The responses were recorded on a scale of 1-5 and the data was analyzed using SPSS version (25). The relationship between categorical variables was analyzed using the Chi-square test and a p value of 0.05’ was considered significant. \nResults: The questionnaire responses from the A and B groups were recorded. Three important elements were examined: efficacy, value, and the technique for recording constructive feedback. Both groups believed that positive feedback is essential. While there was agreement on various aspects, a substantial difference was also noticed between the perceptive of the two groups in a few areas. Generally, students were observed of being responsive and perceptive, but the instructor’s responded oppositely. There was a considerable disparity in the extent/quantity of input supplied. While the teachers thought it was acceptable, the students did not. \nConclusion: The observed differences between the two stakeholders could create a barrier in the effectiveness of feedback and hence the learning process. The comparison in perspective helped in to understand that students and faculty members approve and understand the effectiveness and value of feedback. Encouraging and utilizing this mode to improve learning is required to strengthen students’ education and teaching environment. There were a few conflict areas in accepting, encouraging, and utilization of feedback in the learning process. The medical education department may play a role in abolishing these conflicts to best utilize the affectivity of feedback.","PeriodicalId":53838,"journal":{"name":"Annals Abbasi Shaheed Hospital & Karachi Medical & Dental College","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Abbasi Shaheed Hospital & Karachi Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58397/ashkmdc.v27i03.508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the students’ and faculty’s perspectives of feedback & its values in an outcome-based medical education system. Methods:  This was a cross-sectional, self-evaluated questionnaire-based observational study con- ducted on the students (group A) and faculty members (group B) of the College of Medicine, Majmaah University by convenience sampling technique. Prior to taking the feedback, consent was taken from the students and faculty members.  The responses were recorded on a scale of 1-5 and the data was analyzed using SPSS version (25). The relationship between categorical variables was analyzed using the Chi-square test and a p value of 0.05’ was considered significant. Results: The questionnaire responses from the A and B groups were recorded. Three important elements were examined: efficacy, value, and the technique for recording constructive feedback. Both groups believed that positive feedback is essential. While there was agreement on various aspects, a substantial difference was also noticed between the perceptive of the two groups in a few areas. Generally, students were observed of being responsive and perceptive, but the instructor’s responded oppositely. There was a considerable disparity in the extent/quantity of input supplied. While the teachers thought it was acceptable, the students did not. Conclusion: The observed differences between the two stakeholders could create a barrier in the effectiveness of feedback and hence the learning process. The comparison in perspective helped in to understand that students and faculty members approve and understand the effectiveness and value of feedback. Encouraging and utilizing this mode to improve learning is required to strengthen students’ education and teaching environment. There were a few conflict areas in accepting, encouraging, and utilization of feedback in the learning process. The medical education department may play a role in abolishing these conflicts to best utilize the affectivity of feedback.
KSA基于结果的医学教育系统中学生与教师对有效反馈的看法分析
目的:评价和比较结果型医学教育体系中学生和教师对反馈的看法及其价值。方法:采用横断面、自评式问卷调查法,对马吉玛大学医学院学生(a组)和教师(B组)采用方便抽样法进行观察性研究。在接受反馈之前,要征得学生和教职员工的同意。以1-5的分值记录调查结果,并使用SPSS版本(25)对数据进行分析。分类变量之间的关系采用卡方检验,p值0.05为显著性。结果:记录了A组和B组的问卷回答情况。考察了三个重要因素:疗效、价值和记录建设性反馈的技术。两组人都认为积极的反馈是必不可少的。虽然在许多方面有一致意见,但也注意到两组人在一些领域的看法有很大的不同。一般来说,学生被观察到反应灵敏和敏锐,但教师的反应相反。在提供的投入的程度/数量上有相当大的差距。虽然老师们认为这是可以接受的,但学生们却不这么认为。结论:观察到的两个利益相关者之间的差异可能会对反馈的有效性造成障碍,从而影响学习过程。观点上的比较有助于理解学生和教师认可并理解反馈的有效性和价值。鼓励和利用这种模式来促进学习,是加强学生教育教学环境的需要。在学习过程中,在接受、鼓励和利用反馈方面存在一些冲突。医学教育部门可以在消除这些冲突方面发挥作用,以最好地利用反馈的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信