A andbeta;-Blocker may be Effective on Ventricular Contractile Mechanisms in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved, but not Reduced, Ejection Fraction

S. Ushiroda
{"title":"A andbeta;-Blocker may be Effective on Ventricular Contractile Mechanisms in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved, but not Reduced, Ejection Fraction","authors":"S. Ushiroda","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ventricular contractile responses to β-blockers remain largely unknown in patients with AtrialFibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF), despite the recommended use of β-blockers as first-line pharmacotherapyfor these patients. This study investigated β-blocker effects on ventricular contractile mechanisms, namely theFrank-Starling Mechanism (FSM), Mechanical Restitution (MR), and Postextrasystolic Potentiation (PESP), whichare closely associated with ventricular contractile function, in AF patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF) versusreduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Twenty AF patients were divided into two groups based on EF: the HFpEF group (EF ≥ 50%, n=14)and the HFrEF group (EF<40%, n=6). Using impedance cardiography, an FSM-MR graph and a PESP graph werecreated by applying (dZ/dt) min values representing the peak velocity of aortic blood flow on the y-axis againstpreceding RR interval (RR1) or RR1/pre-preceding RR interval (RR2) ratio values on the x-axis at baseline and afteradministration of a β-blocker in AF patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF. Results: With the β-blocker administration, rates of increase in median (dZ/dt) min values showed a significantpositive correlation with the rates of increase in median RR1 values as the functions of the FSM-MR in AF patientswith HFpEF (ρ=0.88, P<0.001), in contrast to those with HFrEF (ρ=−0.43, P=0.40). PESP index values representingthe extent of the effect of PESP were similarly and significantly decreased after administration of the β-blocker inboth groups: AF patients with HFpEF (baseline: median 5.9 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 2.0-16.9] vs. after β-blocker:median 1.6 [IQR 0.62-7.2]; P=0.023), and AF patients with HFrEF (baseline: median 6.6 [IQR 0.66-22.6] vs. after β-blocker: median 1.2 [IQR 0.06-15.1]; P=0.028). Conclusions: From the perspective of ventricular contractile mechanisms in AF, the β-blocker may be effectiveon the Frank-Starling mechanism and mechanical restitution in AF patients with HFpEF, but not HFrEF","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventricular contractile responses to β-blockers remain largely unknown in patients with AtrialFibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF), despite the recommended use of β-blockers as first-line pharmacotherapyfor these patients. This study investigated β-blocker effects on ventricular contractile mechanisms, namely theFrank-Starling Mechanism (FSM), Mechanical Restitution (MR), and Postextrasystolic Potentiation (PESP), whichare closely associated with ventricular contractile function, in AF patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF) versusreduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Twenty AF patients were divided into two groups based on EF: the HFpEF group (EF ≥ 50%, n=14)and the HFrEF group (EF<40%, n=6). Using impedance cardiography, an FSM-MR graph and a PESP graph werecreated by applying (dZ/dt) min values representing the peak velocity of aortic blood flow on the y-axis againstpreceding RR interval (RR1) or RR1/pre-preceding RR interval (RR2) ratio values on the x-axis at baseline and afteradministration of a β-blocker in AF patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF. Results: With the β-blocker administration, rates of increase in median (dZ/dt) min values showed a significantpositive correlation with the rates of increase in median RR1 values as the functions of the FSM-MR in AF patientswith HFpEF (ρ=0.88, P<0.001), in contrast to those with HFrEF (ρ=−0.43, P=0.40). PESP index values representingthe extent of the effect of PESP were similarly and significantly decreased after administration of the β-blocker inboth groups: AF patients with HFpEF (baseline: median 5.9 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 2.0-16.9] vs. after β-blocker:median 1.6 [IQR 0.62-7.2]; P=0.023), and AF patients with HFrEF (baseline: median 6.6 [IQR 0.66-22.6] vs. after β-blocker: median 1.2 [IQR 0.06-15.1]; P=0.028). Conclusions: From the perspective of ventricular contractile mechanisms in AF, the β-blocker may be effectiveon the Frank-Starling mechanism and mechanical restitution in AF patients with HFpEF, but not HFrEF
A和β受体阻滞剂可能对房颤合并心力衰竭患者的心室收缩机制有效,这些患者的射血分数保持不变,但没有降低
背景:心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)患者对β受体阻滞剂的心室收缩反应在很大程度上仍然未知,尽管推荐使用β受体阻滞剂作为这些患者的一线药物治疗。本研究研究了β受体阻滞剂对房颤合并HF患者保留(HFpEF)和降低射血分数(HFrEF)心室收缩机制的影响,即与心室收缩功能密切相关的frank - starling机制(FSM)、机械恢复(MR)和收缩后增强(PESP)。方法:将20例房颤患者根据EF分为两组:HFpEF组(EF≥50%,n=14)和HFrEF组(EF<40%, n=6)。使用阻抗心动图,在心房纤颤合并HFpEF和HFrEF患者基线和服用β受体阻滞剂后,用(dZ/dt) min值表示主动脉血流峰值速度在y轴上相对于术前RR间期(RR1)或RR1/术前RR间期(RR2)比值值在x轴上绘制FSM-MR图和PESP图。结果:与HFrEF患者(ρ= - 0.43, P=0.40)相比,HFpEF AF患者中位(dZ/dt) min值的增加率与FSM-MR功能中位RR1值的增加率呈显著正相关(ρ=0.88, P<0.001)。在两组中,代表PESP效果程度的PESP指数在给予β-阻滞剂后相似且显著降低:HFpEF AF患者(基线:中位数5.9[四分位间距(IQR) 2.0-16.9]与β-阻滞剂后:中位数1.6 [IQR 0.62-7.2];P=0.023),以及伴有HFrEF的房颤患者(基线:中位数6.6 [IQR 0.66-22.6] vs. β受体阻滞剂治疗后:中位数1.2 [IQR 0.06-15.1];P = 0.028)。结论:从房颤的心室收缩机制来看,β受体阻滞剂可能对房颤伴HFpEF患者的Frank-Starling机制和机械恢复有效,但对HFrEF无效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信