The Effects of Scapular Mobilisation on Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Mine Koya
{"title":"The Effects of Scapular Mobilisation on Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study","authors":"Mine Koya","doi":"10.23937/2572-3243.1510051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to examine acute effects of scapular mobilisation on upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: This study was a crossover randomised controlled trial. 12 young healthy individuals (10 men and two women, age 21.1 ± 0.3 years, body mass index 20.4 ± 1.9) were recruited. At two separate sessions, participants received randomly assigned interventions; scapular mobilisation or placebo intervention. Range of motion in elbow extension and pain during ULNT1 were assessed before and after each intervention. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in ULNT1 only after scapular mobilisation (p < 0.05). No significant change in pain level was identified in the two groups. The scapular mobilisation group displayed large or moderate effect sizes to improve ULNT1 and pain, whereas effect sizes of placebo intervention were small. Conclusions: Large-amplitude end-range scapular mobilisation significantly improved ULNT1 in asymptomatic participants. Scapular mobilisation might be able to affect mechanosensitivity of the nervous system. Further research is required to test its effects among symptomatic patients with nerve-related neck and arm pain.","PeriodicalId":16374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3243.1510051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine acute effects of scapular mobilisation on upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1) in asymptomatic adults. Methods: This study was a crossover randomised controlled trial. 12 young healthy individuals (10 men and two women, age 21.1 ± 0.3 years, body mass index 20.4 ± 1.9) were recruited. At two separate sessions, participants received randomly assigned interventions; scapular mobilisation or placebo intervention. Range of motion in elbow extension and pain during ULNT1 were assessed before and after each intervention. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in ULNT1 only after scapular mobilisation (p < 0.05). No significant change in pain level was identified in the two groups. The scapular mobilisation group displayed large or moderate effect sizes to improve ULNT1 and pain, whereas effect sizes of placebo intervention were small. Conclusions: Large-amplitude end-range scapular mobilisation significantly improved ULNT1 in asymptomatic participants. Scapular mobilisation might be able to affect mechanosensitivity of the nervous system. Further research is required to test its effects among symptomatic patients with nerve-related neck and arm pain.
肩胛骨活动对上肢神经动力学测试1的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照的交叉研究
目的:本研究旨在探讨肩胛骨活动对无症状成人上肢神经动力学测试1 (ULNT1)的急性影响。方法:本研究为交叉随机对照试验。招募健康青年12例(男10例,女2例,年龄21.1±0.3岁,体重指数20.4±1.9)。在两个单独的疗程中,参与者接受随机分配的干预措施;肩胛骨活动或安慰剂干预。在每次干预之前和之后评估ULNT1期间肘关节伸展的活动范围和疼痛。结果:仅肩胛骨活动后ULNT1改善有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者疼痛程度无明显变化。肩胛骨活动组在改善ULNT1和疼痛方面表现出较大或中等的效果,而安慰剂干预的效果较小。结论:无症状参与者的大幅度末端肩胛骨活动可显著改善ULNT1。肩胛骨活动可能会影响神经系统的机械敏感性。需要进一步的研究来测试它对有神经相关性颈部和手臂疼痛症状的患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信