THE NEED FOR RESEARCH ON PUBLIC SUBJECTIVE RIGHTSOF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIESFROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POLISH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Tomasz Sienkiewicz
{"title":"THE NEED FOR RESEARCH ON PUBLIC SUBJECTIVE RIGHTSOF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIESFROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POLISH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW","authors":"Tomasz Sienkiewicz","doi":"10.31743/RECL.4310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When dealing with citizens, public administration has numerous opportunities for abuse of its privileged position. The study of public subjective rights of disabled persons in public law is important because the relation under administrative law is not an equal relation. The state is always the stronger party. When a party to this relation is a person with a dysfunction of the body, a situation is created which is highly unfavourable for this person because of the natural tendency of the state system (including public authorities) to use its privileged position. This can result in actual discrimination of persons with disabilities. The purpose of the law is the common good and welfare of individual persons. Respecting the welfare of persons with disabilities in the public law guarantees the realization of the common good. One can not create the law while ignoring the rules governing human life. As Petrażycki wrote, “the highest good to which we should strive in policy in general and legal policy in particular – is the moral development of man and the rule of highest rational ethics among human beings, namely, the ideal of love” (Petrażycki, 1968, translation mine).","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/RECL.4310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When dealing with citizens, public administration has numerous opportunities for abuse of its privileged position. The study of public subjective rights of disabled persons in public law is important because the relation under administrative law is not an equal relation. The state is always the stronger party. When a party to this relation is a person with a dysfunction of the body, a situation is created which is highly unfavourable for this person because of the natural tendency of the state system (including public authorities) to use its privileged position. This can result in actual discrimination of persons with disabilities. The purpose of the law is the common good and welfare of individual persons. Respecting the welfare of persons with disabilities in the public law guarantees the realization of the common good. One can not create the law while ignoring the rules governing human life. As Petrażycki wrote, “the highest good to which we should strive in policy in general and legal policy in particular – is the moral development of man and the rule of highest rational ethics among human beings, namely, the ideal of love” (Petrażycki, 1968, translation mine).
波兰行政法视角下残疾人公共主体性权利研究的必要性
在与公民打交道时,公共行政有许多机会滥用其特权地位。在行政法上,残疾人的公共主体性权利并不是平等的关系,因此研究公法上的残疾人公共主体性权利具有重要意义。国家永远是更强大的一方。当这种关系的一方是一个身体有功能障碍的人时,由于国家系统(包括公共当局)利用其特权地位的自然倾向,就会产生对这个人非常不利的情况。这可能导致对残疾人的实际歧视。法律的目的是为了个人的共同利益和福利。在公法上尊重残疾人的福利是实现公共利益的保障。一个人不能无视支配人类生活的规则而创造法律。正如Petrażycki所写的那样,“我们在一般政策,特别是法律政策中应该努力达到的最高利益是人类的道德发展和人类最高理性伦理的统治,即爱的理想”(Petrażycki, 1968,翻译我)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信