M. Gennaro, E. Meneghini, P. Baili, S. Bravaccini, A. Curcio, M. D. De Santis, L. Lozza, C. Listorti, S. Di Cosimo, M. Sant, S. Folli
{"title":"High consistency between characteristics of primary intraductal breast cancer and subtype of subsequent ipsilateral invasive cancer","authors":"M. Gennaro, E. Meneghini, P. Baili, S. Bravaccini, A. Curcio, M. D. De Santis, L. Lozza, C. Listorti, S. Di Cosimo, M. Sant, S. Folli","doi":"10.1177/0300891619867845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a morphologic precursor of invasive cancer and is often treated with adjuvant whole-breast irradiation and endocrine therapy, as if it were an invasive cancer. Our aim was to provide further support for treatment de-escalation or enrollment of such patients in active surveillance trials. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients with conservatively treated primary DCIS subsequently diagnosed with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBC) at 2 comprehensive breast cancer centers. From their merged databases, we identified 50 cases with full details on tumor grade, hormone receptor expression, and HER2 amplification, for both the primary DCIS and the corresponding IBC, and we assessed the similarities and differences between the two. Results: Distributions of hormone receptors were similar in primary DCIS and IBC, while high-grade and HER2-positive status was less common in IBC than in primary DCIS. The positivity for estrogen receptors (ER) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated morphology in the primary DCIS persisted in 90% of the matching IBC. Changes in progesterone receptor expression were slightly more common than those in ER expression. Overall consistency for the luminal-like receptors subtype was found in 90% of cases. Conclusion: The high consistency between the features of primary DCIS and those of subsequent IBC (in the rare but not negligible cases of local failure) should be borne in mind when considering the therapeutic options. Treatment de-escalation and accrual of patients for active surveillance trials could be appropriate for luminal-like precursors.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"85 1","pages":"64 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891619867845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a morphologic precursor of invasive cancer and is often treated with adjuvant whole-breast irradiation and endocrine therapy, as if it were an invasive cancer. Our aim was to provide further support for treatment de-escalation or enrollment of such patients in active surveillance trials. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients with conservatively treated primary DCIS subsequently diagnosed with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBC) at 2 comprehensive breast cancer centers. From their merged databases, we identified 50 cases with full details on tumor grade, hormone receptor expression, and HER2 amplification, for both the primary DCIS and the corresponding IBC, and we assessed the similarities and differences between the two. Results: Distributions of hormone receptors were similar in primary DCIS and IBC, while high-grade and HER2-positive status was less common in IBC than in primary DCIS. The positivity for estrogen receptors (ER) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated morphology in the primary DCIS persisted in 90% of the matching IBC. Changes in progesterone receptor expression were slightly more common than those in ER expression. Overall consistency for the luminal-like receptors subtype was found in 90% of cases. Conclusion: The high consistency between the features of primary DCIS and those of subsequent IBC (in the rare but not negligible cases of local failure) should be borne in mind when considering the therapeutic options. Treatment de-escalation and accrual of patients for active surveillance trials could be appropriate for luminal-like precursors.
背景:导管原位癌(Ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS)被认为是浸润性癌症的形态学前兆,通常采用辅助全乳照射和内分泌治疗,就好像它是一种浸润性癌症一样。我们的目的是为降低治疗升级或将此类患者纳入主动监测试验提供进一步的支持。方法:我们回顾性分析2个综合性乳腺癌中心保守治疗的原发性DCIS患者随后诊断为同侧浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)的资料。从他们合并的数据库中,我们确定了50例具有肿瘤分级、激素受体表达和HER2扩增的完整细节的病例,包括原发性DCIS和相应的IBC,我们评估了两者之间的异同。结果:激素受体在原发性DCIS和IBC中的分布相似,而IBC中高级别和her2阳性状态的发生率低于原发性DCIS。在90%的匹配IBC中,原发性DCIS中雌激素受体(ER)和高分化或中度分化形态学呈阳性。孕激素受体表达的变化比内质网表达的变化更常见。在90%的病例中发现了发光样受体亚型的总体一致性。结论:原发性DCIS与继发IBC的特征高度一致(在罕见但不可忽视的局部失败病例中),在考虑治疗方案时应牢记。主动监测试验的治疗降级和患者累积可能适用于发光样前体。