Impact of race and ethnicity on family participation in systemic lupus erythematosus genetic studies

R. Scofield, Rohan Sharma, T. Aberle, C. Cooney, J. Kelly, J. Harley, A. Rasmussen
{"title":"Impact of race and ethnicity on family participation in systemic lupus erythematosus genetic studies","authors":"R. Scofield, Rohan Sharma, T. Aberle, C. Cooney, J. Kelly, J. Harley, A. Rasmussen","doi":"10.3389/flupu.2023.1100534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a higher prevalence and is more severe in African Americans and Hispanics than in non-Hispanic Whites. To understand the shared and unique genetic risk factors of these populations, an adequate representation of African Americans and Hispanics in clinical and genetic research is indispensable while challenging. The goal of this study was to identify differences in research participation of families of different racial and ethnic backgrounds and the potential causes for the disparities. Methods Families were screened for eligibility to the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR) after self-referral or physician referral. We recorded the sociodemographic characteristics, self-identified race and ethnicity, ACR-SLE criteria, and the reasons given for not completing study participation for all families. Results A total of 1,472 families (950 non-Hispanic White, 405 African American, and 117 Hispanic) were screened but only 366 completed study participation (25%). Participation rates and reasons for non-participation varied between racial and ethnic groups. The main reason for African American families to not participate was that subjects critical to the family structure declined participation (OR = 1.6, p = 0.0001), while for White families, the main cause was that purported SLE patients did not meet ACR SLE criteria (OR = 1.81, p < 0.00002). Hispanics were the most likely to complete participation (OR = 4.25, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Successful recruitment of patients, families, and specific demographic groups is critical for the study of genetically complex diseases, such as SLE. There are significant disparities in SLE family recruitment across groups of people, likely due to their richly different cultures and environments.","PeriodicalId":94014,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in lupus","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in lupus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/flupu.2023.1100534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a higher prevalence and is more severe in African Americans and Hispanics than in non-Hispanic Whites. To understand the shared and unique genetic risk factors of these populations, an adequate representation of African Americans and Hispanics in clinical and genetic research is indispensable while challenging. The goal of this study was to identify differences in research participation of families of different racial and ethnic backgrounds and the potential causes for the disparities. Methods Families were screened for eligibility to the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR) after self-referral or physician referral. We recorded the sociodemographic characteristics, self-identified race and ethnicity, ACR-SLE criteria, and the reasons given for not completing study participation for all families. Results A total of 1,472 families (950 non-Hispanic White, 405 African American, and 117 Hispanic) were screened but only 366 completed study participation (25%). Participation rates and reasons for non-participation varied between racial and ethnic groups. The main reason for African American families to not participate was that subjects critical to the family structure declined participation (OR = 1.6, p = 0.0001), while for White families, the main cause was that purported SLE patients did not meet ACR SLE criteria (OR = 1.81, p < 0.00002). Hispanics were the most likely to complete participation (OR = 4.25, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Successful recruitment of patients, families, and specific demographic groups is critical for the study of genetically complex diseases, such as SLE. There are significant disparities in SLE family recruitment across groups of people, likely due to their richly different cultures and environments.
种族和民族对家族参与系统性红斑狼疮遗传研究的影响
目的:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)在非裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人中比在非西班牙裔白人中更为严重。为了了解这些人群的共同和独特的遗传风险因素,在临床和遗传研究中充分代表非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人是必不可少的,同时也是具有挑战性的。本研究的目的是找出不同种族和民族背景的家庭在研究参与方面的差异,以及造成差异的潜在原因。方法对自我推荐或医生推荐的家庭进行狼疮家庭登记和资料库(LFRR)的筛选。我们记录了所有家庭的社会人口学特征、自我认定的种族和民族、ACR-SLE标准以及未完成研究参与的原因。结果共筛查了1472个家庭(950个非西班牙裔白人,405个非洲裔美国人和117个西班牙裔),但只有366个完成了研究参与(25%)。参与率和不参加的原因因种族和族裔群体而异。非裔美国家庭不参与的主要原因是对家庭结构至关重要的受试者拒绝参与(OR = 1.6, p = 0.0001),而白人家庭不参与的主要原因是声称的SLE患者不符合ACR SLE标准(OR = 1.81, p < 0.00002)。西班牙裔最有可能完成参与(OR = 4.25, p < 0.0001)。结论:成功招募患者、家庭和特定人群对于研究遗传复杂疾病(如SLE)至关重要。不同人群在SLE家族招募方面存在显著差异,这可能是由于不同的文化和环境所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信