Quality Innovation in Healthcare – The Challenge of the Third Era

Pieter J. Kievit, M. Schoorl, Jeannette Oomes, Piet Bartels
{"title":"Quality Innovation in Healthcare – The Challenge of the Third Era","authors":"Pieter J. Kievit, M. Schoorl, Jeannette Oomes, Piet Bartels","doi":"10.26417/303oix63f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the third era of quality assurance in health care, innovation is no longer the exclusive focus area of the individual medical professional dedicated to optimizing patient care nor is it achieved by design thinking by the health delivery organization aiming for economic sustainability. Change platform in the third era is the community of professionals, committed to providing the best possible care within the limits of organizational logic. We aim to clarify the conditions for sustainable quality improvement in health delivery organizations and in doing so to provide a means of improving initial feasibility assessment by identifying critical factors in the cooperation between different parties. We designed a model representing the sources of influence on the process of decision making regarding the selection of innovations and choosing the most effective implementation strategy. These sources are: aspects of legitimacy, core values and change readiness. We tested this model on a project, aimed at improving the efficiency of the OR in a Dutch University Clinic. The example project failed to deliver the projected outcome because of non-disclosed conflicting interpretations of core values and an implicit controversial status shift between medical professionals and OR management. This confirms the explaining power of our model. Successful implementation of quality innovation in health care depends (among other things) on addressing the challenges of differing concepts of legitimacy, conflicting core values and varying change readiness between social systems in complex organizations. Installing a QIC as such does not meet these challenges.","PeriodicalId":11935,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"79 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/303oix63f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the third era of quality assurance in health care, innovation is no longer the exclusive focus area of the individual medical professional dedicated to optimizing patient care nor is it achieved by design thinking by the health delivery organization aiming for economic sustainability. Change platform in the third era is the community of professionals, committed to providing the best possible care within the limits of organizational logic. We aim to clarify the conditions for sustainable quality improvement in health delivery organizations and in doing so to provide a means of improving initial feasibility assessment by identifying critical factors in the cooperation between different parties. We designed a model representing the sources of influence on the process of decision making regarding the selection of innovations and choosing the most effective implementation strategy. These sources are: aspects of legitimacy, core values and change readiness. We tested this model on a project, aimed at improving the efficiency of the OR in a Dutch University Clinic. The example project failed to deliver the projected outcome because of non-disclosed conflicting interpretations of core values and an implicit controversial status shift between medical professionals and OR management. This confirms the explaining power of our model. Successful implementation of quality innovation in health care depends (among other things) on addressing the challenges of differing concepts of legitimacy, conflicting core values and varying change readiness between social systems in complex organizations. Installing a QIC as such does not meet these challenges.
医疗保健的质量创新——第三时代的挑战
在医疗保健质量保证的第三个时代,创新不再是个人医疗专业人员致力于优化患者护理的独家关注领域,也不再是由旨在经济可持续性的卫生服务组织通过设计思维实现的。第三个时代的变革平台是专业人士的社区,致力于在组织逻辑的限制内提供尽可能最好的护理。我们的目标是明确卫生服务机构可持续提高质量的条件,并通过确定各方合作中的关键因素,为改进初步可行性评估提供一种手段。我们设计了一个模型,表示在选择创新和选择最有效的实施策略的决策过程中的影响来源。这些来源是:合法性、核心价值观和变革准备。我们在一个项目中测试了这个模型,该项目旨在提高荷兰大学诊所手术室的效率。由于未披露的对核心价值的相互矛盾的解释以及医疗专业人员和手术室管理人员之间隐含的有争议的地位转移,示例项目未能实现预期结果。这证实了我们模型的解释力。卫生保健质量创新的成功实施(除其他事项外)取决于解决复杂组织中不同的合法性概念、冲突的核心价值观和不同社会系统之间变革准备程度的挑战。像这样安装QIC并不能满足这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信