Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective

Saiful Risky, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Mabarroh Azizah
{"title":"Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective","authors":"Saiful Risky, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Mabarroh Azizah","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The massive number of money politic and clientelism cases occurring between legislative electoral candidates and the community should be eradicated, especially as the general election comes close. This article analyzed the causes of money politic and clientelism in the electoral system and which electoral system that Indonesia as a state should pursue in the legal political context. This normative juridical research discussed the subjects from the point of view of positive legal norms in Indonesia and focused on a statutory approach. The research data were collected by reviewing various literatures. From the research findings, it was concluded that the open-list proportional electoral system in Indonesia in Law No. 7 Year 2017 concerning General Election should be changed into a close-list one considering that the legal politic of the Law on General Election led to the many money politic cases occurring before and after the election. The Constitutional Court in its decision No. 144/PUU-XX/2022 rejected entirely the application for a change of proportional electoral system in the Law on General Election for many considerations and the upcoming general election in 2024 would still use the open-list proportional electoral system. Nevertheless, in the national legal political context, the party drafting the Law on General Election was authorized by the Constitutional Court to change the electoral system in the future on various requirements that they need to fulfill.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volksgeist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The massive number of money politic and clientelism cases occurring between legislative electoral candidates and the community should be eradicated, especially as the general election comes close. This article analyzed the causes of money politic and clientelism in the electoral system and which electoral system that Indonesia as a state should pursue in the legal political context. This normative juridical research discussed the subjects from the point of view of positive legal norms in Indonesia and focused on a statutory approach. The research data were collected by reviewing various literatures. From the research findings, it was concluded that the open-list proportional electoral system in Indonesia in Law No. 7 Year 2017 concerning General Election should be changed into a close-list one considering that the legal politic of the Law on General Election led to the many money politic cases occurring before and after the election. The Constitutional Court in its decision No. 144/PUU-XX/2022 rejected entirely the application for a change of proportional electoral system in the Law on General Election for many considerations and the upcoming general election in 2024 would still use the open-list proportional electoral system. Nevertheless, in the national legal political context, the party drafting the Law on General Election was authorized by the Constitutional Court to change the electoral system in the future on various requirements that they need to fulfill.
从国家行政视角看印尼选举制度法律的政治配置
尤其在议会选举即将到来之际,应该彻底杜绝立法选举候选人和社会之间的金钱政治和裙带关系。本文分析了选举制度中金钱政治和裙带主义产生的原因,以及印尼作为一个国家在法律政治背景下应该实行何种选举制度。这项规范性法律研究从印度尼西亚积极法律规范的角度讨论了这些问题,并侧重于法定方法。通过查阅文献收集研究资料。根据研究结果,考虑到《议会选举法》的法律政治导致选举前后发生了许多金钱政治案件,认为印度尼西亚2017年第7号《议会选举法》中的开放式比例选举制度应该改为封闭式比例选举制度。宪法法院在其第144/PUU-XX/2022号决定中,出于多种考虑,完全拒绝了在《大选法》中修改比例选举制度的申请,即将举行的2024年大选仍将使用公开名单比例选举制度。然而,在国家法律政治背景下,起草《议会选举法》的政党得到了宪法法院的授权,可以根据他们需要满足的各种要求,在未来改变选举制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信