{"title":"THE REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL ACTOR STRATEGIES ENFOLDED IN AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER","authors":"Ribut Surjowati, Roely - Ardianyah, Sugeng - Susiloadi, Siti Azizah","doi":"10.14710/parole.v12i2.240-252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this research are to explain how and why Sydney Morning Herald communicates its ideologies in such a way through the social actors represented in news reports. The data collected were analyzed by using Fairclough’s and Van Dijk’s model of Critical Discourse analysis (CDA) and Theo Van Leeuwen’s framework of the representation of social actors. The findings show that the newspaper viewed the Out group social actors which were Indonesian government, Indonesian army and Indonesian military officers and In Group social actors which were Australian, Papuan activists and those who support Papuan conflict, in terms of assimilation, nomination and categorization, functionalization and identification, Impersonalization. These categorizations serve different purposes. Those which are related to the Out groups express a purpose to emphasize their brutality, superiority and dominance towards the indigenous Papuans. However, In Groups social actors were indicated as peace makers. These findings illustrate Australia’s political ideologies and hidden agenda for Indonesia. Australia is liberal country which respects individual freedom; therefore, government must protect and get justice. That is why, it is also became Australia’s responsibility to give aids to Papuans who is seeking better place as stated in the international law. Furthermore, Australia’s attitudes in trying to interference the conflict by providing a place for the Papuan asylum seekers is a picture of how this country is concerned towards Indonesia ","PeriodicalId":30934,"journal":{"name":"Parole Journal of Linguistics and Education","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parole Journal of Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v12i2.240-252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purposes of this research are to explain how and why Sydney Morning Herald communicates its ideologies in such a way through the social actors represented in news reports. The data collected were analyzed by using Fairclough’s and Van Dijk’s model of Critical Discourse analysis (CDA) and Theo Van Leeuwen’s framework of the representation of social actors. The findings show that the newspaper viewed the Out group social actors which were Indonesian government, Indonesian army and Indonesian military officers and In Group social actors which were Australian, Papuan activists and those who support Papuan conflict, in terms of assimilation, nomination and categorization, functionalization and identification, Impersonalization. These categorizations serve different purposes. Those which are related to the Out groups express a purpose to emphasize their brutality, superiority and dominance towards the indigenous Papuans. However, In Groups social actors were indicated as peace makers. These findings illustrate Australia’s political ideologies and hidden agenda for Indonesia. Australia is liberal country which respects individual freedom; therefore, government must protect and get justice. That is why, it is also became Australia’s responsibility to give aids to Papuans who is seeking better place as stated in the international law. Furthermore, Australia’s attitudes in trying to interference the conflict by providing a place for the Papuan asylum seekers is a picture of how this country is concerned towards Indonesia
本研究的目的是解释《悉尼先驱晨报》如何以及为什么通过新闻报道中所代表的社会行动者以这种方式传达其意识形态。本文采用Fairclough和Van Dijk的批评性话语分析模型(CDA)和Theo Van Leeuwen的社会行动者表征框架对所收集的数据进行分析。研究结果显示,该报从同化、提名与分类、功能化与认同、非人格化等方面看待印尼政府、印尼军队与印尼军官等外群体社会行为者,以及澳洲人、巴布亚活动人士与巴布亚冲突支持者等内群体社会行为者。这些分类服务于不同的目的。那些与Out集团有关的人表达了一种目的,强调他们对土著巴布亚人的残暴、优越和统治。然而,在小组中,社会行动者被指出是和平缔造者。这些发现说明了澳大利亚对印度尼西亚的政治意识形态和隐藏的议程。澳大利亚是一个尊重个人自由的自由国家;因此,政府必须保护和伸张正义。因此,澳大利亚也有责任按照国际法的规定,向正在寻求更好处境的巴布亚人提供援助。此外,澳大利亚试图通过为寻求庇护的巴布亚人提供住所来干涉冲突的态度反映了该国对印度尼西亚的关切